Abstract:BackgroundBy the end of the 2013–2016 West African Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks, a total of 3814 cases (probable and confirmed) and 2544 deaths were reported in Guinea. Clearly, surveillance activities aiming at stopping human-to-human transmission have been the breakthrough of EVD outbreak management, but their application has been at times easier said than done. This article presents five confirmed or probable EVD cases that arose in Conakry towards the end of the Guinea epidemic, which demonstrate fl… Show more
“…During the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, the investigation of each confirmed EVD case had 2 main components: (1) epidemiological investigation, which aimed at finding the link of acute EVD cases with ongoing chains of transmission, identifying high- and low-risk contacts and performing contact tracing (ie, following them up for 21 days and isolating them as soon as they manifest EVD-like symptoms) [ 2 , 3 ]; (2) molecular investigation, which utilized whole-genome sequencing to identify cluster of infections by mapping genetic relationships between virus variants from different patients, particularly when a clear epidemiological link could not be established [ 4–6 ].…”
The 2014–2016 Ebola virus (EBOV) disease outbreak affected over 29000 people and left behind the biggest cohort (over 17000 individuals) of Ebola survivors in history. Although the persistence of EBOV in body fluids of survivors was reported before the recent outbreak, new evidence revealed that the virus can be detected up to 18 months in the semen, which represents the biggest risk of Ebola resurgence in affected communities. In this study, we review the knowledge on the Ebola flare-ups that occurred after the peak of the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
“…During the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, the investigation of each confirmed EVD case had 2 main components: (1) epidemiological investigation, which aimed at finding the link of acute EVD cases with ongoing chains of transmission, identifying high- and low-risk contacts and performing contact tracing (ie, following them up for 21 days and isolating them as soon as they manifest EVD-like symptoms) [ 2 , 3 ]; (2) molecular investigation, which utilized whole-genome sequencing to identify cluster of infections by mapping genetic relationships between virus variants from different patients, particularly when a clear epidemiological link could not be established [ 4–6 ].…”
The 2014–2016 Ebola virus (EBOV) disease outbreak affected over 29000 people and left behind the biggest cohort (over 17000 individuals) of Ebola survivors in history. Although the persistence of EBOV in body fluids of survivors was reported before the recent outbreak, new evidence revealed that the virus can be detected up to 18 months in the semen, which represents the biggest risk of Ebola resurgence in affected communities. In this study, we review the knowledge on the Ebola flare-ups that occurred after the peak of the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
“…Prioritising investment in health personnel (training and capacity building, increasing the number through recruitment and retention strategies)85 132 137 142–145…”
IntroductionLearning is a key attribute of a resilient health system and, therefore, is central to health system strengthening. The main objective of this study was to analyse how Guinea’s health system has learnt from the response to outbreaks between 2014 and 2021.MethodsWe used a retrospective longitudinal single embedded case study design, applying the framework conceptualised by Sheikh and Abimbola for analysing learning health systems. Data were collected employing a mixed methods systematic review carried out in March 2022 and an online survey conducted in April 2022.ResultsThe 70 reports included in the evidence synthesis were about the 2014–2016 Ebola virus disease (EVD), Measles, Lassa Fever, COVID-19, 2021 EVD and Marburg virus disease. The main lessons were from 2014 to 2016 EVD and included: early community engagement in the response, social mobilisation, prioritising investment in health personnel, early involvement of anthropologists, developing health infrastructure and equipment and ensuring crisis communication. They were learnt through information (research and experts’ opinions), action/practice and double-loop and were progressively incorporated in the response to future outbreaks through deliberation, single-loop, double-loop and triple-loop learning. However, advanced learning aspects (learning through action, double-loop and triple-loop) were limited within the health system. Nevertheless, the health system successfully controlled COVID-19, the 2021 EVD and Marburg virus disease. Survey respondents’ commonly reported that enablers were the creation of the national agency for health security and support from development partners. Barriers included cultural and political issues and lack of funding. Common recommendations included establishing a knowledge management unit within the Ministry of Health with representatives at regional and district levels, investing in human capacities and improving the governance and management system.ConclusionOur study highlights the importance of learning. The health system performed well and achieved encouraging and better outbreak response outcomes over time with learning that occurred.
“…Unlike past outbreaks, the West African case lasted for more than two years. By March 2016, there had been more than 28,646 cases of evd and over 11,323 deaths worldwide, primarily in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, making the outbreak significantly larger and deadlier than all previous Ebola outbreaks combined (Keita et al 2017).…”
Section: Background: the West African Ebola Outbreakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-two days had then passed since the last person confirmed to have Ebola virus disease tested negative (who 2016). In Guinea, where the outbreak originated, there were a total of 3,355 confirmed and 456 probable cases, including 2,544 deaths (Keita et al 2017).…”
Section: Background: the West African Ebola Outbreakmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.