Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1718918.1718934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons from thoughtswap-ing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the systems are based on the idea of leveraging spectators' personal hand-held devices in the interaction, to create more participatory learning situations and thus invite every student to engage in thinking activity [60]. These types of solutions can be used in various social settings to support group work, including small-group education settings [17,29], large-group education settings [19,20], or professional settings [30]. Despite these apparent differences, the different settings share the same challenge: there are clear social roles between people [e.g.…”
Section: Presemomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the systems are based on the idea of leveraging spectators' personal hand-held devices in the interaction, to create more participatory learning situations and thus invite every student to engage in thinking activity [60]. These types of solutions can be used in various social settings to support group work, including small-group education settings [17,29], large-group education settings [19,20], or professional settings [30]. Despite these apparent differences, the different settings share the same challenge: there are clear social roles between people [e.g.…”
Section: Presemomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this, it has been shown that such tools support participation and engagement [e.g. 29,30,57], promote peer learning [43,71], create opportunities for focused discussions without side-tracking the face-to-face interactions [5,43] and improves self-expression [17,29,45]. However, there are also disadvantages which can limit how extensively such systems are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reinforce the advantages of on-site meetings (Beaudouin-Lafon, 1999). However, there are some drawbacks, such as the high costs associated with getting people together, the excessive attention to minor issues, individual anxiety regarding how ideas will be received (Nunamaker et al, 1991), individual tension associated with being a speaker (difficulties regarding eloquence and the exposition of ideas)(Dickey-Kurdziolek et al, 2010) and lack of good meeting records. These problems often result in less productive meetings (Nunamaker et al, 1991).…”
Section: Theoretical Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interfaces afford restatements, such as annotation and anchoring tools [7,10], but do not call out this affordance explicitly. The only work we have found that explicitly supports restatement is the classroom tool ThoughtSwap [16]. Students submit ideas in response to a prompt, and then other students can pull ideas out of the "hat" and re-present those ideas.…”
Section: Related Design Workmentioning
confidence: 99%