2020
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.9.5.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons from the Ramond sector

Abstract: We revisit the consistency of torus partition functions in (1+1)d fermionic conformal field theories, combining old ingredients of modular invariance/covariance with a modernized understanding of bosonization/fermionization dualities. Various lessons can be learned by simply examining the oft-ignored Ramond sector. For several extremal/kinky modular functions in the bootstrap literature, we can either rule out or identify the underlying theory. We also revisit the N = 1 Maloney-Witten partition function by ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(160 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partition function in this case is given by Z(τ ) = j(τ ) − 1728, which also arises as the Norton series for a certain pair of elements in the Monster group (see equation (73.4c) in [37, p. 425]). Although we do not have a direct physical interpretation for this problem, generalized modular transformations do arise in theories with discrete anomalies [38] or fermions [39,40], including sectors that obey Z(−1/τ ) = −Z(τ ).…”
Section: Uncertainty Principlementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The partition function in this case is given by Z(τ ) = j(τ ) − 1728, which also arises as the Norton series for a certain pair of elements in the Monster group (see equation (73.4c) in [37, p. 425]). Although we do not have a direct physical interpretation for this problem, generalized modular transformations do arise in theories with discrete anomalies [38] or fermions [39,40], including sectors that obey Z(−1/τ ) = −Z(τ ).…”
Section: Uncertainty Principlementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our results naturally fall into the scope of conformal bootstrap program [25,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. We hope the techniques/functions used here would be useful in the broader context of this program, especially for the studies related to extremal functionals and dispersive sum rules [45][46][47][48][49] and its connection to analyticity in replica correlator [50].…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)288mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This SPT phase arises, for example, as the infra-red limit of two Majorana fermions with masses of opposite sign and, in the condensed matter literature, it is better known as the topological phase of the Kitaev chain [5,8] . Recent applications of this topological field theory can found [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, on a Riemann surface with boundary, the Arf topological field theory is not well defined: it suffers the same mod 2 anomaly that we saw above.…”
Section: The Mod 2 Anomalymentioning
confidence: 96%