1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00263-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons from natural forests as keys for sustainable management and improvement of naturalness in managed broadleaved forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regular, even-aged structure as observed in present-day managed stands is not natural for this ecosystem and is responsible for a loss of biodiversity (Schnitzler, Borlea 1998). One approach to increase the habitat diversity in the interventional part of the reserve could be to develop management systems that mimic the natural patterns and processes related to the mosaic cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regular, even-aged structure as observed in present-day managed stands is not natural for this ecosystem and is responsible for a loss of biodiversity (Schnitzler, Borlea 1998). One approach to increase the habitat diversity in the interventional part of the reserve could be to develop management systems that mimic the natural patterns and processes related to the mosaic cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management status and developmental phases are two main factors that influence SDTs dynamics [20,21,28,40]. Samples were taken exclusively in the neutrophilous silver fir-beech forest as site conditions also seemed to have an effect on SDTs [22,44].…”
Section: Sampling Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, maintenance of snags has become an integrated part of forest management in France [15]. There is limited information currently available concerning the amount and distribution of SDT in managed and unmanaged forests in France [13,25,40]. We assessed existing levels of snags in unmanaged ancient forests to provide a basis for what might be considered as high amounts of snags under present conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two plots have also a low degree of CC, 20 % in SA-4 and 10 % in SB-4, which corresponds to the minimum threshold in discriminating a forest according to FAO (2001). The amount of CWD is equal to 0.9 m 3 ha -1 in SA-4 (Table 2), below the threshold of 134 m 3 ha -1 found in sessile oak woodlands (Petritan et al, 2012), 91.4 and 214.2 m 3 ha -1 (Schnitzler & Borlea, 1998;Wijdeven, 2004) in mixed woods with beech; in SB-4 is equal to 1 m 3 ha -1 (Table 2), even this less than 65.4 m 3 ha -1 (Carvalho, 2011) and 83 m 3 ha -1 reported by Manning et al (2013). Both plots do not exceed the minimum threshold of 10 m 3 ha -1 , indicated by Vallauri (2005) for the forests of the Central-Southern Italy.…”
Section: Plotmentioning
confidence: 72%