Lessons from lockdown: Media discourse on the role of behavioural science in the UK COVID-19 response

Abstract

In recent years behavioural science has quickly become embedded in national level policy making. As the contributions of behavioural science to the UK’s Covid-19 response policies in early 2020 became apparent, a debate emerged in the British media about its involvement. This served as a unique opportunity to capture public discourse and representation of behavioural science in fast-track, high-stake national policy making. Aimed at identifying elements which foster and detract from trust and credibility in emergent scientific contributions to policy making, in study 1 we use corpus linguistics and thematic analysis to map the narrative around the key behavioural science actors and concepts which were discussed in the 650 news articles extracted from the 15 most read British newspapers over the 12-week period surrounding the first hard UK lockdown from March 2020. We report and discuss 1) the salience of key concepts and actors as the debate unfolded, 2) quantified changes in the polarity of the sentiment expressed toward them and their policy application contexts, and 3) patterns of co-occurrence via network analysis. In Study 2, we investigate how salience and sentiment of key themes observed in traditional media discourse tracked on original Twitter chatter (N = 2,187). In Study 3, we complement these findings with a qualitative analysis of the subset of news articles which contained the most extreme sentiments (N = 111), providing an in-depth perspective of sentiments and discourse developed around keywords, as either promoting or undermining their credibility in, and trust toward behaviourally informed policy. We discuss our findings in light of the integration of behavioural science in national policy making under emergency constraints.

Wellbeing: Alternative Policy Perspectives

“…The integration of well-being considerations into emergency preparedness and response also comes with a number of questions, while the extent to which the public trust and value inputs from social and behavioural science relative to STEM is still not apparent. In a recent paper Sanders et al [55], find that the media discourse around the role of behavioural science in the UK's Covid response was largely positive, but highly controversial with regard to the specific inputs that drove the central response. Understanding trust in social science in highstakes environments is thus a high priority for capacity building in this area, in particular understanding both public and policymakers perception of the role of social and behavioural scientists in expert advisory groups.…”

Incorporating Wellbeing and Mental Health Research to Improve Pandemic Response

“…The integration of wellbeing considerations into emergency preparedness and response also comes with a number of questions, while the extent to which the public trust and value inputs from social and behavioural science relative to STEM is still not apparent. In a recent paper Sanders et al [54], find that the media discourse around the role of behavioural science in the UK's COVID-19 response was largely positive, but highly controversial with regard to the specific inputs that drove the central response. Understanding trust in social science in highstakes environments is thus a high priority for capacity building in this area, in particular understanding both public and policy-makers perception of the role of social and behavioural scientists in expert advisory groups.…”