Abstract:Amongst urinary tests, the combined use of HPLC/ED determination of normetanephrine and metanephrine seems the most effective screening strategy for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. The older total metanephrine photometric assay is grieved by analytical interferences.
“…It confirms, if needed, that urine assays are sound methods for this purpose (8,10,11,12,13,15,17,18,20). This study also confirms a clear usefulness of plasma assays in a major clinical centre as already demonstrated (10,11,12,13,15,17,18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Total uNMA and uMA were extracted on cationic and anionic columns (Bio-Rad) (8). pNMA and pMA assays were based on a published method (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients from other departments were not included. The population in which the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma was questioned resembled the one previously reported (8). It included patients referred for high blood pressure, which did not respond to the usual treatments (chronic as well as acute hypertension) including subjects in the emergency department of cardiology, non-specific signs of phaeochromocytoma (spells, sweating, palpitations, etc.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement upon considering individual analytes is indeed especially noticeable on the specificity attached to 100% sensitivity. We used to routinely propose a graphical approach for urine total MA (NMA and MA axis) (8). A very similar graph can be drawn for plasma-free MA (16).…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 12 years ago, our laboratory established local reference ranges for urinary analytes used for the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma of patients investigated in cardiology and endocrinology departments (8). This first study was used i) to phase out obsolete assays such as photometric methods or systematic vanilmandelic assay and ii) to re-organise HPLC-ED assays to obtain fast production of results of urinary normetanephrine (uNMA) and urinary metanephrine (uMA) assays.…”
Objectives: We set up plasma normetanephrine (pNMA) and metanephrine (pMA) assays as they demonstrated their usefulness for diagnosing phaeochromocytomas. Our scope is to describe some practical laboratory aspects and the clinical relevance of these assays in our endocrinological or cardiological departments. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of MA from a population of in-and outpatients over a 7-year period. Subjects (nZ2536) from endocrinological or cardiological departments were investigated (66 phaeochromocytomas). Urinary NMA (uNMA) and pNMA, and urinary MA (uMA) and pMA were assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Results: pNMA and pMA assays are now more frequently requested than uNMA and uMA. This changed our laboratory work load with improved delivery, sensitivity and reliability of plasma assays as well as reduced apparatus maintenance time. The pNMA and pMA upper reference limits (URLs) of subjects with no phaeochromocytoma were 1040 and 430 pmol/l respectively. Sensitivity and specificity based on receiver operating characteristic curves optimal points were 83 and 93% for pNMA at 972 pmol/l and 67 and 98% for pMA at 638 pmol/l. Sensitivity and specificity of paired tests of pMA (positive test: at least one analyte above its URLs) were 100 and 91% respectively. Conclusion: The very low concentration of analytes requires a sustained very good apparatus analytical sensitivity. This can be obtained in an up-to-date laboratory. In terms of clinical performances, assays in plasma or urine are equivalent. Depending on local preferences, populations, strategies or departments, requests for one or the other assay may sustain the need for specifically defined reference ranges.
“…It confirms, if needed, that urine assays are sound methods for this purpose (8,10,11,12,13,15,17,18,20). This study also confirms a clear usefulness of plasma assays in a major clinical centre as already demonstrated (10,11,12,13,15,17,18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Total uNMA and uMA were extracted on cationic and anionic columns (Bio-Rad) (8). pNMA and pMA assays were based on a published method (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients from other departments were not included. The population in which the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma was questioned resembled the one previously reported (8). It included patients referred for high blood pressure, which did not respond to the usual treatments (chronic as well as acute hypertension) including subjects in the emergency department of cardiology, non-specific signs of phaeochromocytoma (spells, sweating, palpitations, etc.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement upon considering individual analytes is indeed especially noticeable on the specificity attached to 100% sensitivity. We used to routinely propose a graphical approach for urine total MA (NMA and MA axis) (8). A very similar graph can be drawn for plasma-free MA (16).…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 12 years ago, our laboratory established local reference ranges for urinary analytes used for the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma of patients investigated in cardiology and endocrinology departments (8). This first study was used i) to phase out obsolete assays such as photometric methods or systematic vanilmandelic assay and ii) to re-organise HPLC-ED assays to obtain fast production of results of urinary normetanephrine (uNMA) and urinary metanephrine (uMA) assays.…”
Objectives: We set up plasma normetanephrine (pNMA) and metanephrine (pMA) assays as they demonstrated their usefulness for diagnosing phaeochromocytomas. Our scope is to describe some practical laboratory aspects and the clinical relevance of these assays in our endocrinological or cardiological departments. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of MA from a population of in-and outpatients over a 7-year period. Subjects (nZ2536) from endocrinological or cardiological departments were investigated (66 phaeochromocytomas). Urinary NMA (uNMA) and pNMA, and urinary MA (uMA) and pMA were assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Results: pNMA and pMA assays are now more frequently requested than uNMA and uMA. This changed our laboratory work load with improved delivery, sensitivity and reliability of plasma assays as well as reduced apparatus maintenance time. The pNMA and pMA upper reference limits (URLs) of subjects with no phaeochromocytoma were 1040 and 430 pmol/l respectively. Sensitivity and specificity based on receiver operating characteristic curves optimal points were 83 and 93% for pNMA at 972 pmol/l and 67 and 98% for pMA at 638 pmol/l. Sensitivity and specificity of paired tests of pMA (positive test: at least one analyte above its URLs) were 100 and 91% respectively. Conclusion: The very low concentration of analytes requires a sustained very good apparatus analytical sensitivity. This can be obtained in an up-to-date laboratory. In terms of clinical performances, assays in plasma or urine are equivalent. Depending on local preferences, populations, strategies or departments, requests for one or the other assay may sustain the need for specifically defined reference ranges.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.