2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3325987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons for Tax Reform from an Equilibrium Model of Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, when φ > 0.068, the quality growth rate z * is positive (i.e., the fully endogenous-growth regime emerges in equilibrium). Ferraro et al (2019) estimate the operating cost parameter φ and find that its mean estimate is 0.125 with a standard error of 0.027. 20 Therefore, we can conclude that under reasonable parameter values, the fully endogenous-growth regime with both quality-improving innovation and variety-expanding innovation is more likely to emerge than the semi-endogenous growth regime.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, when φ > 0.068, the quality growth rate z * is positive (i.e., the fully endogenous-growth regime emerges in equilibrium). Ferraro et al (2019) estimate the operating cost parameter φ and find that its mean estimate is 0.125 with a standard error of 0.027. 20 Therefore, we can conclude that under reasonable parameter values, the fully endogenous-growth regime with both quality-improving innovation and variety-expanding innovation is more likely to emerge than the semi-endogenous growth regime.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%