2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013332108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons about parks and poverty from a decade of forest loss and economic growth around Kibale National Park, Uganda

Abstract: We use field data linked to satellite image analysis to examine the relationship between biodiversity loss, deforestation, and poverty around Kibale National Park (KNP) in western Uganda, 1996Uganda, -2006. Over this decade, KNP generally maintained forest cover, tree species, and primate populations, whereas neighboring communal forest patches were reduced by half and showed substantial declines in tree species and primate populations. However, a bad decade for forest outside the park proved a prosperous one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
82
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, research has proceeded on two productive but parallel fronts: one focusing on the drivers of tropical forest cover change , Geist and Lambin 2002, Lambin et al 2003, Gibbs et al 2010) and the other on forest use and social inequality among forest users (Cavendish 2000, Fisher 2004, Godoy et al 2004, Angelsen et al 2014. Studies of tropical forest cover change, combining satellite imagery and household surveys, have successfully identified the "signal" of economic structural change, specific economic policies (e.g., credit), migration and remittances, household demographics, and livelihood diversification in the forest landscape in Neotropical America (e.g., McCracken et al 1999, Walker 2003, VanWey et al 2007, Turner 2010, Naughton-Treves et al 2011. Such work reveals clearly that forests are not only impacted and transformed through use, but also that their composition is a reflection of underlying social and economic processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, research has proceeded on two productive but parallel fronts: one focusing on the drivers of tropical forest cover change , Geist and Lambin 2002, Lambin et al 2003, Gibbs et al 2010) and the other on forest use and social inequality among forest users (Cavendish 2000, Fisher 2004, Godoy et al 2004, Angelsen et al 2014. Studies of tropical forest cover change, combining satellite imagery and household surveys, have successfully identified the "signal" of economic structural change, specific economic policies (e.g., credit), migration and remittances, household demographics, and livelihood diversification in the forest landscape in Neotropical America (e.g., McCracken et al 1999, Walker 2003, VanWey et al 2007, Turner 2010, Naughton-Treves et al 2011. Such work reveals clearly that forests are not only impacted and transformed through use, but also that their composition is a reflection of underlying social and economic processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Reserve management authority allocates a yearly wildlife quota for communities to hunt, and also share 16 per cent of the total revenue generated through commercial photographic and hunting tourism directly with communities through Community-based Natural Resource Management Committees (Jorge et al, 2013). This community engagement is based on growing evidence that well managed protected areas can reduce poverty, improve rural livelihoods and promote peace and stability (Naughton-Treves et al, 2011;Ferraro et al, 2011;Maekawa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Allan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller, qualitative studies have illustrated in great detail the causal mechanisms by which park-side communities have struggled, which have included eviction , alienation of resources (Neumann 1998), and impoverishment (Cernea and SchmidtSoltau 2006). Recently, larger quantitative studies that include controls have observed some poverty alleviation near PAs (Andam et al 2010, Sims 2010, Barrett et al 2011, Naughton-Treves et al 2011) though the cause of change is generally not clear. This discrepancy points to the need for new research that uses mixed methodologies to examine both the cause of changing social welfare indicators and the incidence of change within a comparative framework that includes controls (Wilkie et al 2006, Redford 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%