2021
DOI: 10.1080/21640629.2020.1866851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less may be more: how do coach developers reproduce “learner-centred” policy in practice?

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of coach development has seen coaches at the centre of the process, sometimes seeking to understand the nature of preferred support (i.e., informal or formal; Mallett et al, 2009 ), sometimes considering the evaluation of coaches (i.e., coach behaviours; Cushion, 2010 ) and sometimes even promoting the switch toward a learner -centred process ( Paquette and Trudel, 2018 ). Indeed, recent research has started to consider what coaches need from the consumer (athlete; e.g., Becker, 2009 ), why athletes follow coaches (e.g., Rylander, 2015 ) and who coach development policy should be cascaded to ( Dempsey et al, 2021 ). From this research, it is clear that coach education has proven to be impactful, influencing both the initial and continual training of professional coaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of coach development has seen coaches at the centre of the process, sometimes seeking to understand the nature of preferred support (i.e., informal or formal; Mallett et al, 2009 ), sometimes considering the evaluation of coaches (i.e., coach behaviours; Cushion, 2010 ) and sometimes even promoting the switch toward a learner -centred process ( Paquette and Trudel, 2018 ). Indeed, recent research has started to consider what coaches need from the consumer (athlete; e.g., Becker, 2009 ), why athletes follow coaches (e.g., Rylander, 2015 ) and who coach development policy should be cascaded to ( Dempsey et al, 2021 ). From this research, it is clear that coach education has proven to be impactful, influencing both the initial and continual training of professional coaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, coach education has been criticised for its failure to impact on coaches' professional learning (see Jones and Wallace, 2005;Nelson, Cushion & Potrac, 2012;Stodter and Cushion, 2019a, inter alia). However, standardised, content-driven instruction based on rather simplistic views of learning has made way for shifts towards more participatory, 'learner centred' perspectives (Dempsey, Cope, Richardson, Littlewood and Cronin, 2021), embracing a variety of strategies in the development of coaches and coaching (Paquette & Trudel, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPD course had brought coach developers together to discuss and better understand organisational policy. In this way, this course may have gone some way in responding to Dempsey, Cope, Richardson, Littlewood, and Cronin's (2020) calls for a consideration of how policy is cascaded down and filtered through an organisation.…”
Section: Understanding the Organisational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Argyris and Schön (1974) suggest "understanding how we diagnose and construct our experience, take action, and monitor our behaviour while simultaneously achieving our goals is crucial to understanding and enhancing effectiveness" (p.xxxii). Therefore, creating opportunities for coach developers to take time to deconstruct their espoused theories, the organisation they work for and also practice is an important process to undertake (Dempsey et al, 2020). From here, coach developers can (re)construct theoriesin-use that align with practice and the organisation.…”
Section: Understanding the Organisational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%