Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less invasive treatments for pure aortic insufficiency: Are we there yet?

Abstract: The gold standard for the treatment of pure aortic insufficiency (PAI) is surgical valve repair or replacement. With the newest transcatheter heart valve technologies and the accumulating years of experience of heart teams with the current transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prostheses, implanters have pushed the envelope with off‐label use of those valves designed and approved for aortic stenosis, in patients with PAI especially those at higher risks or for compassionate use. However, new prostheses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAVR has been described in heart transplant patients as early as 2010 [ 1 ], and has been attempted at increasing intervals from the original transplant, with cases showing success at 9 [ 1 ], 14 [ 2 ], and greater than 20 years after transplant in patients with aortic stenosis [ 3 , 4 ]. Similarly, TAVR has begun to be used off-label to treat aortic insufficiency in similar patient populations with good results [ 5 ]. While ongoing questions remain about the comparative long-term efficacy of TAVR for aortic insufficiency when compared to surgical valve replacement [ 6 ], for select patients with significant surgical risk, early data show TAVR to be a viable option for patients with unacceptable surgical risk [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAVR has been described in heart transplant patients as early as 2010 [ 1 ], and has been attempted at increasing intervals from the original transplant, with cases showing success at 9 [ 1 ], 14 [ 2 ], and greater than 20 years after transplant in patients with aortic stenosis [ 3 , 4 ]. Similarly, TAVR has begun to be used off-label to treat aortic insufficiency in similar patient populations with good results [ 5 ]. While ongoing questions remain about the comparative long-term efficacy of TAVR for aortic insufficiency when compared to surgical valve replacement [ 6 ], for select patients with significant surgical risk, early data show TAVR to be a viable option for patients with unacceptable surgical risk [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%