2021
DOI: 10.1177/15563316211027828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws

Abstract: Introduction: Pediatric spinal deformity involves a complex 3-dimensional (3D) deformity that increases the risk of pedicle screw placement due to the close proximity of neurovascular structures. To increase screw accuracy, improve patient safety, and minimize surgical complications, the placement of pedicle screws is evolving from freehand techniques to computer-assisted navigation and to the introduction of robotic-assisted placement. Purpose: The aim of this review was to review the current literature on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In pediatrics, no such randomized controlled trial exists to the writers’ knowledge, but a recently performed meta-analysis including (but not limited to) patients with pediatric spinal deformities reported accuracies of 98.8% and 98.7% for robotic placement [7 ▪▪ ,18 ▪▪ ,24 ▪▪ ]. These numbers are similar to the reported accuracy of robotic pedicle screw placement in adults [7 ▪▪ ,18 ▪▪ ,24 ▪▪ ]. A study by Macke et al [34] on 48 pediatric patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement and postoperative CT evaluation demonstrated a 92.7% accuracy rate, which improved to 97.2% for patients whose preoperative CT scans were performed in the prone position.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In pediatrics, no such randomized controlled trial exists to the writers’ knowledge, but a recently performed meta-analysis including (but not limited to) patients with pediatric spinal deformities reported accuracies of 98.8% and 98.7% for robotic placement [7 ▪▪ ,18 ▪▪ ,24 ▪▪ ]. These numbers are similar to the reported accuracy of robotic pedicle screw placement in adults [7 ▪▪ ,18 ▪▪ ,24 ▪▪ ]. A study by Macke et al [34] on 48 pediatric patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement and postoperative CT evaluation demonstrated a 92.7% accuracy rate, which improved to 97.2% for patients whose preoperative CT scans were performed in the prone position.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Most of the studies on use of robots in adult spine surgery describe their use in the lumbosacral spine, and the greatest benefits for robotic spine surgery in adults have been demonstrated for percutaneous screw placement [8,17]. However, to date most pediatric spinal deformity surgery has been performed utilizing open techniques, and most demanding screws in pediatric spinal deformity surgery are typically the proximal to mid-thoracic spine [2,18 ▪▪ ]. In the setting of pediatric scoliosis and syndromic scoliosis (i.e., neurofibromatosis), there is often extreme rotational deformity of the thoracic vertebrae and dysplastic pedicles that necessitate extra-pedicular screw trajectories (“in-out-in” screws) [18 ▪▪ ,19 ▪ ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations