2007
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.107.485995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesion Volume Change After Treatment With Tissue Plasminogen Activator Can Discriminate Clinical Responders From Nonresponders

Abstract: Background and Purpose-A change in acute-to-chronic lesion volume has been proposed as a biomarker for stroke therapies. The objectives of this study were to determine the magnitude of lesion volume change after standard treatment with tissue plasminogen activator and to determine whether specific volume change thresholds can discriminate clinical responders from nonresponders. Methods-We measured lesion volume on diffusion weighted at baseline and on 90-day fluid attenuated inversion recovery MRI and scored 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding indirectly strengthens not only the validity of our methodology to identify RAD, but also the view that the ischemic penumbra extends into the acute DWI lesion. 5,6,8,22,23 As expected, age, initial DWI volume, and recanalization were also associated with ENI. However, the association with RAD was independent of these and other clinical and radiological variables, although, importantly, functional outcome was also independently associated with RAD.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding indirectly strengthens not only the validity of our methodology to identify RAD, but also the view that the ischemic penumbra extends into the acute DWI lesion. 5,6,8,22,23 As expected, age, initial DWI volume, and recanalization were also associated with ENI. However, the association with RAD was independent of these and other clinical and radiological variables, although, importantly, functional outcome was also independently associated with RAD.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Across the whole sample, %RAD was greater for patients treated within the first 3 hours than for those treated in the 3-to 4.5-hour window (14% versus 9% [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; P=0.049). Percent RAD was greater in patients with distal or no occlusion than in those with proximal occlusion (19% versus 9% [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; P=0.003) and in patients with subsequent recanalization as compared with the rest of the sample (17% …”
Section: Dwi Lesion Reversalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,32 It should be valid for recanalization therapy, such as fibrinolysis, which directly decreases the follow-up FLAIR lesion volume from the acute DWI-lesion volume. 33 More attention should be paid to other strategies like neuroprotectors or neurotrophic factors, which could influence disability or handicap levels, while the mean volume may remain unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The use of MRI for patient selection and assessment in thrombolytic stroke trials is supported by evidence that lesion volumes correlate with clinical severity and outcomes [7][8][9] and that reperfusion and attenuation of infarct enlargement are markers of recovery in patients treated with alteplase within the clinically proven time window. 10,11 The clinical trials of the novel thrombolytic desmoteplase (Desmoteplase In Acute Ischemic Stroke [DIAS]), 12 Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke [DE-DAS], 13 and DIAS-2) 14 were the only acute stroke trials to use prerandomization penumbral imaging as a basis of patient selection. In the absence of either a standard quantitative definition of penumbra by PWI-DWI mismatch or a widely available method to measure prerandomization penumbral volumes within the time constraints of a thrombolytic trial at the time these trials were designed, penumbra was defined as any visually apparent mismatch, which approximately corresponds to a volume perfusion defect at least 20% larger than the volume of acute ischemic DWI abnormality, a volume difference likely to be outside the range of volumetric test-retest variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%