1988
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198806000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesion Detectability in Ultrasonic Computed Tomography of Symptomatic Breast Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, ultrasound velocities were, unlike in our study, not directly assessed but were recalculated from tomographic methods. [3][4][5][6] Because of the influences of ultrasound scattering, diffraction, and multiple reflections, calculation errors (linear propagation of waves assumed) are unavoidable, and the influences of the reconstruction algorithm on calculated velocities are difficult to assess.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In most cases, ultrasound velocities were, unlike in our study, not directly assessed but were recalculated from tomographic methods. [3][4][5][6] Because of the influences of ultrasound scattering, diffraction, and multiple reflections, calculation errors (linear propagation of waves assumed) are unavoidable, and the influences of the reconstruction algorithm on calculated velocities are difficult to assess.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were supported by in vivo experiments using ultrasound transmission tomography under laboratory conditions; this technique yielded calculated images with calculated ultrasound velocity information. [3][4][5] In single experiments, these examinations were complemented by simultaneous assessment of ultrasound brightness images, 6 which displayed reflexivity. These complicated methods were not routinely used in clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, challenges exist with the subjective assessment of breast density, as multiple studies have demonstrated significant inter-and intra-reader variability. 16,17 Transmission ultrasound imaging is an emerging technology that has a long history [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] that provides a 3D representation of tissue characteristics. The purpose of the work described in this paper was twofold: (a) to establish an algorithm for quantitative assessment of breast density using full-wave 3D transmission ultrasound imaging 28 and (b) to determine how these quantitative assessments relate to both subjective mammographic assessments of BI-RADS breast composition categories and objective measures provided by FDA-cleared VolparaDensity software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the two methods supplement each other [14]. Breast lesions can change ultrasonic velocity [15,16], although until now it was not possible to use this property for detection and diagnosis in daily practice [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%