2010
DOI: 10.1108/03090591011061220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesbian presentations and representations of leadership, and the implications for HRD

Abstract: Purpose -This paper seeks to identify, examine, and discuss the unique challenges for lesbians who serve in leadership positions in corporate America. Design/methodology/approach -Drawing upon a multi-disciplinary framework of management, diversity, feminist, and leadership literature, the paper critically examines the myriad of pressures exerted upon all women in leadership positions, and then identifies the pressures that are specific and unique for lesbians. Findings -There are pressures that are unique for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LG individuals’ difficulties in getting top positions may be due to status beliefs that create expectations of low competence (Childers, 2000; Webster, Hysom, & Fullmer, 1998). Among LG individuals, lesbian women represent a lower status group because they are a double minority—women and lesbians (Garnets & Kimmel, 1991; Gedro, 2010; Woodruffle-Burton & Bairstow, 2013; see also Fasoli, Cadinu, et al, 2018). Their gender and sexual identities are usually devaluated (see Hancock, 2007), making lesbian women an invisible target (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008).…”
Section: Role Congruity and Status Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LG individuals’ difficulties in getting top positions may be due to status beliefs that create expectations of low competence (Childers, 2000; Webster, Hysom, & Fullmer, 1998). Among LG individuals, lesbian women represent a lower status group because they are a double minority—women and lesbians (Garnets & Kimmel, 1991; Gedro, 2010; Woodruffle-Burton & Bairstow, 2013; see also Fasoli, Cadinu, et al, 2018). Their gender and sexual identities are usually devaluated (see Hancock, 2007), making lesbian women an invisible target (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008).…”
Section: Role Congruity and Status Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gedro (2010) noted that lesbians transgress sexual orientation and often gender roles. Gedro (2010) noted that lesbians transgress sexual orientation and often gender roles.…”
Section: Stereotypes Of Gay Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a related line of research, scholars have examined the effects of violating the female gender role on lesbian employees. Gedro (2010) noted that lesbians transgress sexual orientation and often gender roles. As gay men are expected to conform to the male gender role, similarly are lesbians expected to conform to the female gender role (Goodman & Moradi, 2008).…”
Section: Stereotypes Of Gay Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gedro () noted the need for additional research differentiating the experiences of each of the individual LGBT groups. Publications addressing issues specifically for lesbians in mostly corporate settings (Gedro, ; Gedro ; Gedro, Cervero, & Johnson‐Bailey, ) have emerged over the last decade. Also emerging within the HRD dialogue is a conversation about gay men who work in masculinized industries (Collins, ; Collins & Callahan, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%