“…Also Ouidaina, in Morocco, after finishing a study with 1299 patients from 1993 to 2007, identified 76.4% of tineacapitis due to T. mentagrophytes, while M. canis 13.4% [13]. In the same country, Boumhil, studied 162 patients from 2002 to 2008, finding 63.58% of infections due to T. violaceum and 33.33% to M. canis [14]. Arenas et al, reported in an epidemiological study conducted in the urban and rural zones of Dominican Republic, a resurging of M. audouinii and T. tonsurans respectively, probably due to the migratory movements from Haiti, while M. canis was found in 19.04% and 11.65% respectively [15].…”