“…We have, as for us, to develop -in the C.R.A. of Burgundy 1 [9] -a prospect of psychomotor research on the signs of alert of an early autism; a research eminently developmental and complex articulating a) a positive and negative methodology at the same time (specific signs, presence or absence of indicators of normal development and perceptible and singular abnormalities of these developmental processes), and b) a plural perspective around a developmental early major axis of the child at risk: the psychomotor sphere [tonus, postural, sensori-motricity, development of the playing and the psychomotor interactions, the desire in the interactive driving and physical exploration, the deployment of the executive functions, the perceptive and the praxies, etc.] … With an underlying hypothesis which would be that the defect and the principal abnormality in the very early development of the future autistics (and before even the appearance of the differentials signs that they decline in a way turned out in the cognitive or psycho-affective sphere) this native defect would indeed deceive in the psychomotor register, more exactly in the failure, the failure or the specific abnormality of the crossroads and the early psychomotor knotting.…”