2002
DOI: 10.7202/000343ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les politiques de planification familiale dans les pays en développement : du malthusianisme au féminisme ?

Abstract: RésuméLes programmes de planification familiale mis en oeuvre depuis les années 1950 ont eu pour objectif la réduction de la fécondité et ont pris, parfois violemment, les femmes pour cibles. En réaction, les mouvements féministes, locaux puis transnationaux, ont défini des programmes de santé reproductive intégrés et de qualité et affirmé le droit des femmes à la propriété de leur corps. Leur victoire à la conférence du Caire, en 1994, a été réelle et a suscité de nouvelles po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, family planning activity has not evolved into a global development plan. It was originally centred on women without taking into account either their reproductive health wishes (Sala-Diakanda, 2000) or the constraints of the physical environment (Gauthier, 2002). With a population growth rate of 2.8%, the country's population has increased five-fold over the past five decades (estimated at 70 million), depriving the population of the socioeconomic benefits of controlled fertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, family planning activity has not evolved into a global development plan. It was originally centred on women without taking into account either their reproductive health wishes (Sala-Diakanda, 2000) or the constraints of the physical environment (Gauthier, 2002). With a population growth rate of 2.8%, the country's population has increased five-fold over the past five decades (estimated at 70 million), depriving the population of the socioeconomic benefits of controlled fertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si le caractère informel et non régulé de la transition contraceptive n'a pas empêché la rapidité des changements, on peut dire que la soumission aux lois de l'offre et du marché a eu des conséquences néfastes en termes de santé reproductive et, plus largement, de droits reproductifs (Gautier, 2002) : le taux excessif de césariennes à l'accouchement et le maintien d'un niveau de mortalité maternelle relativement élevé en témoignent. Le paradoxe d'un avortement toujours interdit, mais largement pratiqué selon les lois du marché (comme dans toute l'Amérique latine) traduit la pauvreté des options proposées aux femmes.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Critical scholarships have highlighted how this shift in global discourse from a population control approach to reproductive rights was rather rhetoric than effective (Gautier 2002;Hodgson and Watkins 1997), and that FP initiatives in the Souths largely remained grounded in the theory established by Malthus: "Proposing birth reduction among the global poor as a solution to various global crisis phenomenafrom poverty, economic recession, migration and patriarchal systems to ecological destruction-and thus blaming the poor rather than, for instance, inequality, is typical of neo-Malthusianism" (Bendix and Schultz 2018, p. 260). In fact, as decried by Hartmann among others, the inverse discourse that a better distribution of resources (improvements in living standards) and power (improvements in the position of women) could bring about population change was seldom voiced or heard (Hartmann 2016).…”
Section: Global Framework Of Family Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%