Les participants des cours de croissance personnelle : motifs de fréquentation et expérience des cours et consultation d’autres services de santé. Une étude exploratoire

Lepage, Louis; Letendre, Robert

doi:10.7202/032447ar

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Issues related to the quality of services offered to women having a mammography were extracted. Pertinent issues were also identified from other sources: 1) educational documents for the training of professionals working in the PQDCS screening centers, and 2) a qualitative study assessing the perceptions of 30 women having had a PQDCS mammography in the Quebec City area [19]. Issues were then classified according to recognized dimensions of satisfaction with health services [4-6].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of an instrument assessing women’s satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program

Bairati

Turcotte

Doray

et al. 2014

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe assessment of the quality of mammography services delivered in organized breast cancer screening programs should include measures centered on women’s perceptions. The objective of this study was to develop and validate an instrument in French designed to evaluate the satisfaction of women having a screening mammography.MethodsAn instrument evaluating women’s satisfaction with mammography services was developed using published research, the perceptions of screened women, the expertise of health professionals and a pilot study. Between November 9 and 21, 2011, the questionnaire was sent to 1500 consecutive women having had a screening mammography in eight radiologic facilities designated by the Québec Breast Cancer Screening Program, in Quebec City, Canada. Construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, reliability and sensitivity of the instrument were examined.ResultsA total of 819 women (55%) participated in the validation study. The factor analysis retained four satisfaction dimensions: satisfaction with 1) the technician’s skills (four items), 2) the physical environment (four items), 3) the staff’s communication skills (three items) and 4) the information given by the program (3 items). The multitrait-scaling analysis showed good convergent and discriminant validity: scaling success was 100% for all subscales. All subscales had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas ≥ 0.86). The satisfaction scores were able to identify groups of women with lower levels of satisfaction, such as younger women or women with pain during breast compression.ConclusionThis brief satisfaction instrument, developed in French, showed good psychometric properties to evaluate satisfaction in women receiving mammographic services in an organized breast cancer screening program.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%