2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.psfr.2009.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les nouvelles technologies au service des personnes âgées : entre promesses et interrogations – Une revue de questions

Abstract: To cite this version:Marc-Eric Bobillier-Chaumon, Raluca Oprea Ciobanu. Les RésuméSur la base d'une revue de questions, cet article propose une discussion sur les enjeux psycho-sociaux liés à l'usage des nouvelles technologies pour les personnes âgées. Il en ressort que si ces dispositifs disposent d'atouts indéniables qui peuvent contribuer à améliorer le confort et à la qualité de vie des personnes âgées, il n'en demeure pas moins que le développement rapide de ces technologies suscitent également une sér… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several qualitative studies using focus group methodology reveal that older adults have limited knowledge of technologies which could be offered to them and experience a negative stigma towards them by the simple fact that they use technological tools in their daily lives [42,45,46]. Thus, the use of technologies for home life may contribute to create a new stereotype in the elderly who become "technologically assisted persons", the use of assistive technologies nourishing the stigma of aging and dependence [47,48]. In turn, this vision can lead the elderly to reject new technologies and thus accentuate the digital divide already prevalent in our societies [40].…”
Section: Barriers To Adopting New Technologies Among the Elderly Related To The Users Themselves: Between The Digital Divide And Levers Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several qualitative studies using focus group methodology reveal that older adults have limited knowledge of technologies which could be offered to them and experience a negative stigma towards them by the simple fact that they use technological tools in their daily lives [42,45,46]. Thus, the use of technologies for home life may contribute to create a new stereotype in the elderly who become "technologically assisted persons", the use of assistive technologies nourishing the stigma of aging and dependence [47,48]. In turn, this vision can lead the elderly to reject new technologies and thus accentuate the digital divide already prevalent in our societies [40].…”
Section: Barriers To Adopting New Technologies Among the Elderly Related To The Users Themselves: Between The Digital Divide And Levers Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third factor is the perceived need by the user him/herself for fall prevention and detection systems. This factor is influenced by the older person's self-perceived physical, cognitive, and emotional condition, and self-esteem [47,49,50,52,53,55,56]. Faced with a society increasingly turned towards the use of new technologies, some elderly people feel excluded.…”
Section: Barriers To Adopting New Technologies Among the Elderly Related To The Users Themselves: Between The Digital Divide And Levers Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to maintenance and hospitalization at home and the development of autonomy, gerontechnology also aims to rehabilitate and attenuate some deficiencies (Buiza et al, 2009;Hage, 2008) and to improve the quality of life of older adults (Blaschke, Freddolino, & Mullen, 2009;Bobillier Chaumon, Michel, Tarpin-Bernard, & Croisille, 2013;Bronswijk, van Bouma, & Fozard, 2002). Pervasive assistive technologies are less intrusive than conventional systems of remote assistance or surveillance, as they tend to blend into the living environment (Bobillier Chaumon & Ciobanu, 2009). Thus, they are able to anticipate users' needs by using data from the environment and proposing appropriate solutions (Strong & Gaver, 1996).…”
Section: The Contribution Of Pervasive Assistive Technologies To the mentioning
confidence: 99%