2021
DOI: 10.7202/1081286ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les normes sociales collectives au sein des groupes de soutien d’apprentissage en famille

Abstract: L’apprentissage en famille (AEF) est une option éducative légale encadrée par le ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (MEQ). Son suivi par l’État présente plusieurs défis, notamment concernant l’appréciation de l’expérience éducative. Dans une perspective de gouvernance réflexive, les groupes de soutien locaux et auto-organisés de familles, par leur position intermédiaire et collective, pourraient jouer un rôle de suivi complémentaire et mieux accepté que celui des autorités ministérielles. Au moyen d’entrevues … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the centre of this contentious legal and political context, broad discretionary power is left to the resource persons to evaluate the educational situation of these children and make decisions over whether educational standards, clearly established or not, are being satisfied. The legal and institutional standards already differ; the norms and social constructs held by the resource persons (Farges and Tenret, 2018;Terrillon, 2002) and by the parents (Dumond, 2017) only exacerbate these differences. Certain resource persons from Quebec school boards studied by Brabant (2016) even confide that the collaboration and support they are asked to establish with the parent educators put them in a conflict of interests and of values, both with their mission of supporting the public school, and with their own educational convictions.…”
Section: A Discretionary and Contested Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the centre of this contentious legal and political context, broad discretionary power is left to the resource persons to evaluate the educational situation of these children and make decisions over whether educational standards, clearly established or not, are being satisfied. The legal and institutional standards already differ; the norms and social constructs held by the resource persons (Farges and Tenret, 2018;Terrillon, 2002) and by the parents (Dumond, 2017) only exacerbate these differences. Certain resource persons from Quebec school boards studied by Brabant (2016) even confide that the collaboration and support they are asked to establish with the parent educators put them in a conflict of interests and of values, both with their mission of supporting the public school, and with their own educational convictions.…”
Section: A Discretionary and Contested Powermentioning
confidence: 99%