2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-014-9550-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LES Modeling of the Impact of Heat Losses and Differential Diffusion on Turbulent Stratified Flame Propagation: Application to the TU Darmstadt Stratified Flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the considered configuration which features heat losses, the effect of enthalpy variations on the combustion model is accounted for with a non-adiabatic extension [28,37] of the F-TACLES model. For perfectly-premixed conditions as studied here, the different physical variables are only tabulated as a function of a progress variable Y c and a heat losses correction coefficient [28].…”
Section: Turbulent Reactive Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the considered configuration which features heat losses, the effect of enthalpy variations on the combustion model is accounted for with a non-adiabatic extension [28,37] of the F-TACLES model. For perfectly-premixed conditions as studied here, the different physical variables are only tabulated as a function of a progress variable Y c and a heat losses correction coefficient [28].…”
Section: Turbulent Reactive Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling frequency with the radiation solver was however strongly limited. Regarding the retained approach in the present study, the large-eddy simulation benefits from the continuous advances in combustion modeling [25], in particular on the effect of variable enthalpy due to heat losses on the flame structure and its stabilization [24,[26][27][28]. The conjugate heat transfer is accounted for by solving the heat conduction within the combustor walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the simulations predicted too large temperatures in this region and despite possible modeling uncertainties, this is quite certainly attributed to this effect. Therefore, another approach was discussed at the TNF workshop [27] and adopted by several groups [11,13] afterwards. With the actual wall temperatures being still unknown, it uses the measured temperature at 15 mm above the tube's exit as an a priori knowledge to provide corresponding inlet conditions for the simulation.…”
Section: Treatment Of the Thermal Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the actual wall temperatures being still unknown, it uses the measured temperature at 15 mm above the tube's exit as an a priori knowledge to provide corresponding inlet conditions for the simulation. Furthermore, the temperature of the inner wall is set according to a coupled RANS simulation [13] whereas the heat transfer at the outer wall surface towards slot 1 is still neglected. This approach mostly led to improved predictions and showed a flame lift-off not present in the adiabatic simulations.…”
Section: Treatment Of the Thermal Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation