Les Israélites de Délos et la juiverie délienne.

Bruneau, Philippe; Bordreuil, Pierre

doi:10.3406/bch.1982.1925

Cited by 131 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These accounts ra difficulties, the most important of which is whether they refer to one or two distinct 11 See (Pummer 2018, p. 70). 12 See (Bruneau 1982). This dating has been generally accepted; see for instance (Kraabel 19 White has ascribed the first inscription to after, and the second to before, 166 BCE (White 19 13 See among others (Pummer 2009, p. 17;Kartveit 2014, p. 467).…”

Section: Evidence For Diasporic Samaritan Communities In the Second Cmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…18 Josephus Jewish and Samaritan settlers were in a violent dispute that they (Ptolemy VI Philometor; 180-145 BCE); it concerned the legitim Eventually, the Jewish representatives succeeded in convincing Jerusalem had been erected in accordance with the laws of Mos difficulties, the most important of which is whether they refer t 11 See (Pummer 2018, p. 70). 12 See (Bruneau 1982). This dating has been generally accepted; see f White has ascribed the first inscription to after, and the second to be 13 See among others (Pummer 2009, p. 17;Kartveit 2014, p. 467).…”

Section: Evidence For Diasporic Samaritan Communities In the Second Centmentioning

confidence: 95%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Samaritans during the Hasmonean Period: The Affirmation of a Discrete Identity?

Bourgel

2019

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Hasmonean period (167–63 BCE) is increasingly seen in current scholarship as formative for Samaritan identity and, in particular, as the moment when the Samaritans emerged as a self-contained group separate from the Jews. The first aim of this paper is to give an overview of the condition of the Samaritans during this period. In largely chronological order, the first part of the article discusses the situation of the Samaritans on the eve of the Hasmonean revolt, at the outbreak of the uprising, and under the rule of the first Hasmoneans. The second aim is to review the commonly held causes of the emergence, at this time, of the Samaritans as a discrete community, such as, for instance, the destruction of the Samaritan temple, the production of the Samaritan Pentateuch and the appearance of anti-Samaritan polemics in Jewish literature. The paper concludes that the Hasmoneans’ attitude toward the Samaritans cannot simply be seen as one of hatred and rejection as is generally assumed. Besides; although some of the historical processes beginning in the Hasmonean period had far-reaching implications for the parting of the ways between Jews and Samaritans; their immediate effects should not be overstated.

show abstract

Section: Evidence For Diasporic Samaritan Communities In the Second Cmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Evidence For Diasporic Samaritan Communities In the Second Centmentioning

confidence: 95%

The Samaritans during the Hasmonean Period: The Affirmation of a Discrete Identity?

Bourgel

2019

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These inscriptions more than quadrupled our archive of relevant inscriptions from the period. A smaller corpus of inscriptions from Gerizim were excavated and published a few years prior (Magen, Misgav, and Tsefania 2000), but the most famous Samaritan inscriptions are two Greek examples from Hellenistic Delos which include the Greek transcription Argarizein from the Hebrew (Bruneau 1982; Kartveit 2014; White 1987).…”

Section: Scholarly Moves In the Study Of The Samaritans Since 2004mentioning

confidence: 99%

Samaritans, Biblical Studies, and Ancient Judaism: Recent Trends

Chalmers

2021

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, I survey recent trends in Samaritan studies, with a particular focus on biblical studies and the interactions of Samaritan Israelites with other religious traditions. While remaining entrenched in discussion of the origins of Samaritans, scholars have firmly embraced the idea of processual Samaritan identity, emerging over time and in a non-genealogical sense alongside and interwoven with Judean/Jewish self-definition. Extensive work clusters, in particular, at three nodes: the study of Hebrew-language scriptures, archaeological excavations, and the remodelling of identity-production in a constructivist form. I also sketch out the directions in which the field is moving, with growing and productive emphasis on Aramaic, Arabic, and late antiquity. Finally, I identify some of the quirks of Samaritan studies as it might be encountered, in particular a continued effort to salvage Samaritans for biblical studies, somewhat intermittent interdisciplinarity, and practices of engagement with Samaritan Israelites themselves.

show abstract

“…may be, however, that both the Judean and the Samaritan developments were reactions to an inhospitable, even suffocating, imperial ideology and authority. 16 Two inscriptions from the Aegean island of Delos complement the large corpus from Mount Gerizim (Bruneau 1982). Both praise benefactors for their support of "Israelites who send their temple tax to Argarizein."…”

Section: Story Becomes History Homeland (Again) Becomes Territorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Land/Homeland, Story/History

Berlin¹

2018

The Social Archaeology of the Levant

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

some 200 years earlier, the Tyrian royal house had built a huge compound, about 2,400 m 2 (Berlin and Herbert 2013: 374-6; 2015: 422-3) (Fig. 22.2). Under Ptolemy I, the building was reclaimed for the collection of agricultural produce, likely grain and wine. Several rooms held heavy plastered bins to measure commodities as they were brought in. Others held enormous storage jars, which analysis has shown held bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Berlin et al. 2003). The wheat was both tax revenue and imperial supply; a papyrus dating to 259 BCE records that a Ptolemaic official named Zenon stopped at Kedesh and received two artabas of flour (αλεύρων) for the final leg of his trip (P. Cairo Zen. 59004).

show abstract

Les Israélites de Délos et la juiverie délienne.

Cited by 131 publications

References 0 publications

The Samaritans during the Hasmonean Period: The Affirmation of a Discrete Identity?

The Samaritans during the Hasmonean Period: The Affirmation of a Discrete Identity?

Samaritans, Biblical Studies, and Ancient Judaism: Recent Trends

Land/Homeland, Story/History

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About