2016
DOI: 10.7202/1038240ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les évaluations de l’enseignement par les étudiants : vers une démarche abrégée

Abstract: Cet article documente le processus de simplification de la démarche d’évaluation de l’enseignement par les étudiants. Cette simplification repose sur la conception d’un instrument abrégé qui permet de porter des appréciations valides et fiables sur la qualité de l’enseignement. Une comparaison des qualités psychométriques entre l’instrument original et abrégé est ainsi réalisée. En conclusion, certaines modifications de la version abrégée sont proposées, mais cette version représente néanmoins un substitut adé… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CTEs were received from 125 students (out of a total of 220 students who were registered in the course). Since the CTEs directly refer to teaching and learning situations, such narrative comments also hold a strong external validity (Harvey, 2016). As such, they help to understand students' perceptions about the online course and highlight potential improvements for the future (Simmons & Marquis, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTEs were received from 125 students (out of a total of 220 students who were registered in the course). Since the CTEs directly refer to teaching and learning situations, such narrative comments also hold a strong external validity (Harvey, 2016). As such, they help to understand students' perceptions about the online course and highlight potential improvements for the future (Simmons & Marquis, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of two thematic blocks (15 classes), feedback was provided in the form of 10 questions using Google forms. The questionnaire was developed on the base of the survey of Dash 2 with using to one question replies proposed by Harvey 10 and Krosnick with collaborators 11 : totally agree, somewhat agree, rather disagree, totally disagree, I do not know. All answers were assessed from 5 to 1, according to a Likert scale with the maximum in 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's an indicator of the services quality provided [9]. Thus, satisfaction is used for pedagogical purposes [10], university resource evaluation purposes [11], but also for managerial purposes [12]. Accordingly, our research would attempt to combine these two approaches into a quality assessment approach for STPSA-TS in five Moroccan regulated-access academic institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%