1976
DOI: 10.2307/3667731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les especes belges du "complexe Bryum bicolor" (Musci)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…those described in Archidium wattsii (Stone, 1984), might well have been confused with fungal galls. A similar confusion could well be the case in Bryum barnesii and B. gemmiferum described by Wilczek & Demaret (1976).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…those described in Archidium wattsii (Stone, 1984), might well have been confused with fungal galls. A similar confusion could well be the case in Bryum barnesii and B. gemmiferum described by Wilczek & Demaret (1976).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thus it was regarded as falling within the range of variation of B. bicolor by Smith & Whitehouse (1978) and Smith (1978) and also treated as a synonym of that species by Duell (1992). However, it was treated as a valid species by Wilczek & Demaret (1976), Demaret & Wilczek (1980), Dirkse, van Melick & Touw (1989), Demaret (1993) and Vanderpoorten & Zartman (2002). In Britain, well-marked forms of 'B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern studies have also discovered additional species that differ in characters of tubers and bulbils that were previously ignored (e.g. Crundwell & Nyholm, 1964;Wilczek & Demaret, 1976;Smith & Whitehouse, 1978;Crundwell & Whitehouse, 2001). A series of revisions by H. Ochi covered the genus Bryum in Japan (Ochi, 1959) then almost worldwide (Ochi, 1972(Ochi, , 1980(Ochi, , 1985, but not its European or North American representatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%