2016
DOI: 10.3917/chime.087.0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les deux écosophies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, compared to the approach of Naess favoring the identification centered on nature, and relativizing the positive contribution of the technique, the ecosophy of Guattari is not reduced to ecology. It integrates the technological evolution as an association between man, nature, technology and society (Antonioli, 2015). Reflecting on current challenges of the city, like the relation to the nature, the relation to the other with the worldwide social and ethnic inequalities, as well as the relation to the technique in the urban space, the paper will address these core issues through the ecosophical lens of Naess and Guattari.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared to the approach of Naess favoring the identification centered on nature, and relativizing the positive contribution of the technique, the ecosophy of Guattari is not reduced to ecology. It integrates the technological evolution as an association between man, nature, technology and society (Antonioli, 2015). Reflecting on current challenges of the city, like the relation to the nature, the relation to the other with the worldwide social and ethnic inequalities, as well as the relation to the technique in the urban space, the paper will address these core issues through the ecosophical lens of Naess and Guattari.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%