2014
DOI: 10.3917/reru.144.0613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les déterminants de la fréquence du face-à-face dans les relations interentreprises : une analyse empirique

Abstract: Cet article vise à discuter l’influence des TIC, de la nature des échanges et des formes de proximité (spatiale et non spatiale) sur la fréquence du recours au face-à-face dans les relations client-fournisseur. Les données utilisées sont issues d’une enquête réalisée en 2008 par questionnaire auprès d’un échantillon représentatif de 2 000 PME localisées en Bretagne. Les résultats ne permettent pas de conclure sur le rôle de la nature des connaissances, mais soulignent que la distance spatiale et l’usage des TI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also refers to the possibility for employees or representatives of companies collaborating on joint production or R&D projects (Torre, 2011), to travel to and from each other's sites -to resolve any problems or con icts that may arise, for example -and to collaborate through ICT and travel (Gallaud and Torre, 2004), while setting aside time for joint meetings two or three times a year, rather than to co-locate their operations. Even when the innovation process takes place between geographically close rms, research shows that face-to-face interactions are limited; contrary to the canonical cluster model, they are not daily but rather monthly occurrences (Lethiais and Aguilera, 2014), whereas meetings between neighbors occur at the same pace as those related to remote projects (Grossetti and Bès, 2001). On a more individual level, the development of people's mobility and the need to meet and socialize with others promotes the creation of leisure and amusement parks or spaces designed to ful ll this type of need.…”
Section: Thematic and Conceptual Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It also refers to the possibility for employees or representatives of companies collaborating on joint production or R&D projects (Torre, 2011), to travel to and from each other's sites -to resolve any problems or con icts that may arise, for example -and to collaborate through ICT and travel (Gallaud and Torre, 2004), while setting aside time for joint meetings two or three times a year, rather than to co-locate their operations. Even when the innovation process takes place between geographically close rms, research shows that face-to-face interactions are limited; contrary to the canonical cluster model, they are not daily but rather monthly occurrences (Lethiais and Aguilera, 2014), whereas meetings between neighbors occur at the same pace as those related to remote projects (Grossetti and Bès, 2001). On a more individual level, the development of people's mobility and the need to meet and socialize with others promotes the creation of leisure and amusement parks or spaces designed to ful ll this type of need.…”
Section: Thematic and Conceptual Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…D'autres déterminants permettent aux PME de s'affranchir des caractéristiques de leur localisation pour la mise en place des coopérations. En particulier, les ressources numériques transforment les conditions d'interaction avec les partenaires (Lethiais et Aguiléra, 2014) et facilitent la mise en oeuvre opérationnelle des coopérations pour l'innovation (Trantopoulos, von Krogh, Wallin et Woerter, 2017 ;Urbinati, Chiaroni, Chiesa et Frattini, 2020), y compris pour les PME (Macpherson, 2008). Ces enjeux nous amènent à formuler la question de recherche suivante : dans quelle mesure le numérique et la localisation caractérisent-ils les profils de coopération pour l'innovation des PME ?…”
Section: Introductionunclassified