2015
DOI: 10.3917/crpsy.001.0178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les ateliers senteurs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This same correlation does not appear for randomly distributed points, SDSS quasars or lower-energy gamma-ray AGN. Moreover, the percentage of sources that fall within voids is consistent across the randomly distributed, SDSS The absorption-corrected gamma-ray peak of PKS 1424+240 from Archambault et al (2014) as corrected by the Gilmore et al (2012) model (black points) and for the τ × p lower absorption resulting from the p = 2% lower EBL density (red points). Below 300 GeV, the black and red points are indistinguishable and therefore are left as black.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This same correlation does not appear for randomly distributed points, SDSS quasars or lower-energy gamma-ray AGN. Moreover, the percentage of sources that fall within voids is consistent across the randomly distributed, SDSS The absorption-corrected gamma-ray peak of PKS 1424+240 from Archambault et al (2014) as corrected by the Gilmore et al (2012) model (black points) and for the τ × p lower absorption resulting from the p = 2% lower EBL density (red points). Below 300 GeV, the black and red points are indistinguishable and therefore are left as black.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…PKS 1424+240 has been detected at gamma-ray opacities of τ > 4.5, with the specific value dependent on the EBL model used to estimate the opacity. When the unattenuated gamma ray emission from this distant blazar is reconstructed using current EBL models, the spectrum shows a puzzling flattening or even upturn at the highest energies (Archambault et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bands around each limit indicate the uncertainty in the assumed solar model and velocity distribution. Also shown are limits from other experiments: Ice-Cube [39] bb (brown dashed) / W + W − (brown dot-dashed); BAKSAN [40] τ + τ − (pink solid) / bb (pink dashed) / W + W − (pink dot-dashed); PICASSO [41] (blue solid); SIMPLE [42] (green solid). The black shaded regions are the 3σ C.L.…”
Section: Indirect Wimp Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pile-up effect in the de-absorbed spectra was measured by [29] with a combined significance of 4.2 standard deviations. Also, in a recent publication by the VERITAS collaboration [30] the de-absorbed spectrum of PKS 1424+240 showed a possible pile up even if assuming the lower limit on the redshift of the source (z=0.6), which is uncertain (see Figure 4). One of the explanations of the pile-up effect, if real, is the line-of-sight interactions of high-energy cosmic rays with cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) and EBL.…”
Section: Pile-ups In the Energy Spectra Of Vhe Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%