2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1603.07672
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leptoquark patterns unifying neutrino masses, flavor anomalies, and the diphoton excess

F. F. Deppisch,
S. Kulkarni,
H. Päs
et al.
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latest world-averaged results compiled by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) [12] read: R D * = 0.306 ± 0.013(stat) ± 0.007(syst) and R D = 0.407 ± 0.039(stat) ± 0.024(syst), which indicate a combined deviation from the SM values R SM D * ≈ 0.26 [13][14][15][16] and R SM D ≈ 0.30 [14,[16][17][18][19] at the level of 4σ. Thus far, feasible NP scenarios based on model-independent analyses [13,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] as well as model-dependent constructions such as leptoquarks [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] and two-Higgs-doublet models (2HDM) [35,[43][44][45][46] have been extensively studied towards an explanation of the R D ( * ) anomalies. In particular, the general 2HDM of type-III (2HDM-III) with tree-level flavor-changing neutral current (FCNC) can address the R D ( * ) anomalies [44][45][46], but suffers severe constraint from the B − c lifetime [38,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latest world-averaged results compiled by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) [12] read: R D * = 0.306 ± 0.013(stat) ± 0.007(syst) and R D = 0.407 ± 0.039(stat) ± 0.024(syst), which indicate a combined deviation from the SM values R SM D * ≈ 0.26 [13][14][15][16] and R SM D ≈ 0.30 [14,[16][17][18][19] at the level of 4σ. Thus far, feasible NP scenarios based on model-independent analyses [13,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] as well as model-dependent constructions such as leptoquarks [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] and two-Higgs-doublet models (2HDM) [35,[43][44][45][46] have been extensively studied towards an explanation of the R D ( * ) anomalies. In particular, the general 2HDM of type-III (2HDM-III) with tree-level flavor-changing neutral current (FCNC) can address the R D ( * ) anomalies [44][45][46], but suffers severe constraint from the B − c lifetime [38,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R K result deviates from the SM value R SM K = 1.00 ± 0.01 [52][53][54] in the same q 2 region at the level of 2.6σ, while the R K * measurements deviate from the SM predictions 1 by 2.1 ∼ 2.3σ for the first and 2.4 ∼ 2.5σ for the second q 2 region, depending on the theoretical predictions used [51]. The R K ( * ) deficits stir up both model-independent global analyses [53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] and model-dependent NP constructions such as the Z models [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] and the leptoquark models [33][34][35][36][37][81][82][83][84]. It is generally found that reasonable explanations for the R K ( * ) anomalies at the second q 2 region can be achieved, while the resolution to the R K * deficit at the first q 2 region requires more involved NP scenario [64,66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hints of a possible violation of lepton universality have prompted many theoretical proposals, which include the exchange of charged scalars [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], leptoquarks (or, equivalently, R-parity violating supersymmetry) [16,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], vector resonances [38] or a W boson [18,36,[39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of a leptoquark origin for these anomalies was subsequently explored in more detail in Refs. [28][29][30][31][32][33], making also interesting connections to other possible phenomena such as neutrino masses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%