2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.92.014016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lepton flavor nonuniversality inbs+processes

Abstract: We explore a scenario of New Physics entering the description of B → K ( * ) µµ decay through couplings to the operators O 9,10 , satisfying C 9 = −C 10 . From the current data on B(Bs → µµ) and B(B → Kµµ) [15,22]GeV 2 , we obtain constraints on ReC 10 and ImC 10 which we then assume to be lepton specific, and find RK = B(B → Kµµ)/B(B → Kee) [1,6]GeV 2 = 0.88(8), consistent with recent value measured at LHCb. A specific realization of this scenario is the one with a scalar leptoquark state ∆, in which C 10 is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
141
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by this, in refs. [69,70], the LQR 2 (which respects the global symmetry U(1) B accidentally at the renormalizable level) has been considered leading to the prediction R K * > 1, which is now disfavoured by the LHCb data. The other two optionsS 1 and R 2 were already disfavoured after the measurement of R K [10,71].…”
Section: Jhep09(2017)010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by this, in refs. [69,70], the LQR 2 (which respects the global symmetry U(1) B accidentally at the renormalizable level) has been considered leading to the prediction R K * > 1, which is now disfavoured by the LHCb data. The other two optionsS 1 and R 2 were already disfavoured after the measurement of R K [10,71].…”
Section: Jhep09(2017)010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there are four types of lepto-quark (LQ) mediators giving rise to O (1) lq and O (3) lq at the tree-level [80,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101]. Two have spin one, U µ and U a µ , and two have spin zero, S and S a .…”
Section: Jhep09(2017)061mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning b → sµ + µ − , a solution is not particularly challenging, as one competes with a process which is in the SM loop and CKM suppressed, a rather small NP contribution, involving moderate couplings and not too light masses, is sufficient (like for example in Z models [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], models with loop effects of heavy scalars and fermions [37,38] and also by leptoquark models [9,10,12,[39][40][41][42] 2 ). Also for the a µ anomaly many possible solutions…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%