2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lepidopteran mouthpart architecture suggests a new mechanism of fluid uptake by insects with long proboscises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In hawkmoths, the hover-feeding mode further highlights these challenges because hovering is an energetically demanding flight mode [ 2 ], suggesting that the animals should maximize nectar uptake rate so as to minimize the duration of hovering [ 3 ]. As such, there has been much interest in how structural adaptations could speed nectar transport in the proboscis or otherwise reduce the needed feeding time, including a recent proposal that the lepidopteran (including hawkmoth) proboscis could fill through slits along the side, not just at the tip as in a drinking straw [ 10 ]. If this were the case, ingestion through upper submerged slits would help the moths reduce the amount friction that they need to overcome to ingest nectar due to the length of their proboscises [ 6 ], allowing more rapid nectar uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In hawkmoths, the hover-feeding mode further highlights these challenges because hovering is an energetically demanding flight mode [ 2 ], suggesting that the animals should maximize nectar uptake rate so as to minimize the duration of hovering [ 3 ]. As such, there has been much interest in how structural adaptations could speed nectar transport in the proboscis or otherwise reduce the needed feeding time, including a recent proposal that the lepidopteran (including hawkmoth) proboscis could fill through slits along the side, not just at the tip as in a drinking straw [ 10 ]. If this were the case, ingestion through upper submerged slits would help the moths reduce the amount friction that they need to overcome to ingest nectar due to the length of their proboscises [ 6 ], allowing more rapid nectar uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no extant published work addresses whether proboscis submergence depth influences nectar consumption rate. However, the depth to which M. sexta moths submerge their proboscis varies within and between recordings of feeding events, and recently published theoretical analysis of Lepidopteran mouthpart achitecture suggests that fluid uptake may occur along the length of the proboscis [ 10 ]. This suggests a possible increase in the feeding rate through a deeply submerged proboscis based on a model where transport of nectar through the proboscis has an energy cost proportional to travel distance, and that greater submergence would permit a shorter travel distance that decreased energy costs, increasing nectar ingestion rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have revealed that Lepidoptera pull fluid from the porous surface into the food canal by capillary action via the interlegular spaces and the spaces between the hydrophilic sensilla styloconica and the pressure gradient created by the sucking sump [45,49]. Fluid uptake with the proboscis is mainly comprised of four steps: wetting, dewetting, absorbing, and pumping [50,51]. Many physical determinants represent the fundamental architecture of the proboscis affecting fluid uptake [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1E,F ). Adjacent legulae are separated from one another, creating a sieve-like legular band along the axis of the proboscis, which allows fluids to enter the food canal ( Kornev and Adler, 2019 ; Salamatin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legulae are also hydrophilic throughout the entire length of the proboscis ( Lehnert et al, 2013 ; Zhang et al, 2018b ); thus, nectar or any other liquid would preferentially enter the food canal through the legular bands ( Fig. 1G ) ( Salamatin et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2018a ). Although liquid also could enter the food canal through the permeable bands along the length of the butterfly proboscis, it hardly does so because liquids bead up on the hydrophobic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%