2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-005-6835-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lepidoptera-habitat relationships in urban parks

Abstract: We examined the relationships among Lepidopteran species richness and relative abundance, field and park size, and herbaceous plant richness and cover in parks of New York, NY. Lepidopteran populations and habitats were quantified from 1 June-30 September 2002 in fields of 8 New York City (NYC) parks. We observed 42 species of Lepidoptera, with park size, field size, and plant species richness positively related to Lepidopteran abundance and species richness. Several plant species received heavy use and appear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
4
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, intensively managed sites, such as those frequently mowed, are reported to sustain low populations and abundance of butterflies due to destruction of potential host plants and foraging patches (Stock et al 2003;Tam and Bonebrake 2015). Our study is consistent with others in suggesting that to promote urban butterfly diversity it is necessary to make urban parks as large as possible and to set aside area of parks as "unmanaged" or with limited human management (Giuliano et al 2004). In those areas where management is necessary, planting native butterfly host and nectar plants is the optimal management strategy (Tam and Bonebrake 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, intensively managed sites, such as those frequently mowed, are reported to sustain low populations and abundance of butterflies due to destruction of potential host plants and foraging patches (Stock et al 2003;Tam and Bonebrake 2015). Our study is consistent with others in suggesting that to promote urban butterfly diversity it is necessary to make urban parks as large as possible and to set aside area of parks as "unmanaged" or with limited human management (Giuliano et al 2004). In those areas where management is necessary, planting native butterfly host and nectar plants is the optimal management strategy (Tam and Bonebrake 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, Giuliano et al (2004) reported park size was positively associated with the species richness of butterflies and moths in New York City parks. Di Mauro et al (2007) found that garden size was significantly correlated with the species diversity of generalist butterflies in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area and suggested this was because larger gardens probably contain more resources such as nectar and host plants for butterflies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…rapae is by far the most common butterfly in urban landscapes of North Amercia including New York City (Shapiro and Shapiro 1973;Giuliano et al 2004) and Chicago (Matteson et al 2012). In urban community gardens of New York City P. rapae is forty times as abundant as the next most common butterfly (Matteson and Langellotto 2010).…”
Section: Study Organismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant species richness in urban parks is positively related to Lepidoptera species richness, as demonstrated in New York (Giuliano et al 2004 ). A series of eight parks were surveyed by sweepnetting and transect walks, and results showed that park size was related positively to relative abundance and richness at the park level ( Fig.…”
Section: Urban Parksmentioning
confidence: 69%