Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lentic chironomid performance in species-based bioassessment proving: High-level taxonomy is not a dead end in monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We approached the question of differences in microhabitat preferences and diversity using one of the most ubiquitous, abundant and Science Progress 106 (2) diverse groups of aquatic insects -Chironomidae (Diptera). As they are also used in the bioassessment, 43,44,61 we can immediately have an indication of the system's health. However, most of the bioassessment strategies are based on (chironomid) benthic communities of the typical lentic or lotic water bodies, 43,44,[61][62][63] whilst ponds are overlooked, which was the same with chironomid diversity studies in this floodplain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We approached the question of differences in microhabitat preferences and diversity using one of the most ubiquitous, abundant and Science Progress 106 (2) diverse groups of aquatic insects -Chironomidae (Diptera). As they are also used in the bioassessment, 43,44,61 we can immediately have an indication of the system's health. However, most of the bioassessment strategies are based on (chironomid) benthic communities of the typical lentic or lotic water bodies, 43,44,[61][62][63] whilst ponds are overlooked, which was the same with chironomid diversity studies in this floodplain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they are also used in the bioassessment, 43 , 44 , 61 we can immediately have an indication of the system's health. However, most of the bioassessment strategies are based on (chironomid) benthic communities of the typical lentic or lotic water bodies, 43 , 44 , 61 63 whilst ponds are overlooked, which was the same with chironomid diversity studies in this floodplain. Our research points out the importance of ponds as a specific environment in a floodplain aquatic network, and, furthermore, the macrophytes as another important microhabitat beside sediment, which harbours a specific chironomid community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from serving as prey for other organisms, they are often well-adapted predators and play the role of ecosystem “cleaners” feeding on particulate organic matter. However, some taxa are also quite sensitive to environmental change and as such can serve as indicators of specific environmental conditions [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All life stages (even the short-lived adults) play a vital role in aquatic and terrestrial food webs, serving as an important food source for fish, birds, bats and other arthropods ( Gratton & Zanden, 2009 ; Raunio, Heino & Paasivirta, 2011 ; Armitage, Pinder & Cranston, 2012 ; Wirta et al, 2015 ; Herren et al, 2017 ). This combination of high ecosystem functionality, high abundance, and habitat specificity of the Chironomidae to their environment makes them suitable biological indicators for ecological assessments ( e.g ., water quality control) ( Sæther, 1977 ; Lencioni, Marziali & Rossaro, 2012 ; Dorić et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, only a limited subset of biodiversity studies or biomonitoring surveys of aquatic habitats incorporate species- or genus-level information of the Chironomidae and oftentimes, they are neglected altogether ( Raunio, Heino & Paasivirta, 2011 ; Dorić et al, 2021 ). This is due to several factors: (i) non-biting midges are relatively difficult to identify ( Cranston, 2008 ; Proulx et al, 2013 ), (ii) only few taxonomists with the required expertise are available for species-level identification ( Cranston et al, 2013 ; Chan et al, 2014 ), (iii) traditional morphological-based species delimitations often require laborious dissection and mounting of specimens on microscope slides ( Ekrem, Stur & Hebert, 2010 ; Gadawski et al, 2022 ), and (iv) they can be extremely species rich even in relative low-diversity temperate and boreal ecosystems ( Lundström et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%