2016
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of three fish species from the Yalong River, China

Abstract: Summary Length–weight relationships (LWRs) were determined for three fish species (Gymnodiptychus pachycheilus (Herzenstein, 1892), Triplophysa bleekeri (Sauvage & Dabry de Thiersant, 1874) and Triplophysa pseudostenura (He, Zhang & Song, 2012)) from the Yalong River in China. Samples were obtained between March 2009 and July 2013 using gillnets (25 × 12 m, mesh size 0.5 cm) and fish cages (0.5 × 0.5 × 10 m, mesh size 0.5 cm mesh). For each species, the sample size, length range, weight range, LWR, 95% confide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There were differences in b ‐values calculated in the present study for some fish species when compared with those of other authors (e.g. Bao et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wu et al., ; Zhang et al., ; Liu et al., ). Differences in the LWR can be attributed to several factors: (i) the number of specimens examined, (ii) area/season effect, and (iii) differences in the observed length ranges of the specimens caught (Moutopoulos and Stergiou, ; Franklin et al., ; Sani et al., ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…There were differences in b ‐values calculated in the present study for some fish species when compared with those of other authors (e.g. Bao et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wu et al., ; Zhang et al., ; Liu et al., ). Differences in the LWR can be attributed to several factors: (i) the number of specimens examined, (ii) area/season effect, and (iii) differences in the observed length ranges of the specimens caught (Moutopoulos and Stergiou, ; Franklin et al., ; Sani et al., ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The b value of S. malacanthus (3.315) and T. stolioczkae (3.464) in the present study were higher than estimated ( S. malacanthus , 2.97; T. stolioczkae , 3.09) by Bayesian LWR for the same species or subfamily body shape (Froese and Pauly, ). The b value of S. wangchiachii in the present study (3.086) was higher than that of specimens from the Yalong River (3.054) (Zhang et al., ). The b value of S. malacanthus (3.315) was higher than those reported for the Yalong River (2.852) (Zhang et al., ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The b value of S. wangchiachii in the present study (3.086) was higher than that of specimens from the Yalong River (3.054) (Zhang et al., ). The b value of S. malacanthus (3.315) was higher than those reported for the Yalong River (2.852) (Zhang et al., ). Differences in b values can be resulted from a combination of factors: (i) differences in the number of specimens examined, (ii) area/season effect, (iii) differences in the observed length ranges of the captured specimens (Pan et al., ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Yalong and Wujiang rivers are two important rivers of the Yangtze tributary and are important for local fisheries. These rivers also have a rich fish fauna, which is not well investigated (Liu et al., ; Zhang et al., ). With this study we wish to contribute to the basic knowledge on the biology of five species collected over a period of a decade and for which LWRs were not yet available: Folifer brevifilis (Peters, 1881), Pelteobagrus ussuriensis (Dybowski, 1872), Schistura fasciolata (Nichols & Pope, 1927), Triplophysa daqiaoensis (Ding, 1993) and Triplophysa orientalis (Herzenstein, 1888).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%