2016
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of four fish species from a coastal artisanal fishery, southern Bangladesh

Abstract: Summary This study presents the first report of length–weight relationships (LWRs) for Apocryptes bato (Hamilton, 1822), Salmophasia phulo (Hamilton, 1822), and Silonia silondia (Hamilton, 1822), excluding Anodontostoma chacunda (Hamilton, 1822), from fishermen's catches landed in a coastal artisanal fishery at Patuakhali, Southern Bangladesh. Specimens were sampled occasionally over a period of 1 year between August 2014 and September 2015. Fishes were collected from coastal fishermen using cast nets (mesh si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present mean values of TL and BW are higher than the values for A. jaya (2.75-7.81 cm and 0.14-3.67 g, Kaushik et al, 2015) relative body weight; n, specimen size; ns, not significant at any level; **, highly significant at 1% level (p < 0.01); *, significant at 5% level ( p <0.05) Table II. Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) for condition factors (Fulton's condition factor and relative body weight) with lengths (cm) and body weights (g) of five fishes in the Atrai River, Dinajpur, Bangladesh due to geographical variation but are within the limits for G. cenia (5.50-6.65 cm, Chaki et al, 2013), S. bacaila (3.40-15.20 cm, Masud andSingh, 2015) and S. phulo (6.00-10.70 cm and 1.36-7.21 g, Siddik et al, 2016), respectively. As there is a first record on length and body weight of G. youssoufi in the Atrai River (Islam and Mia, 2016), so no comparison was possible against this value with the previous one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The present mean values of TL and BW are higher than the values for A. jaya (2.75-7.81 cm and 0.14-3.67 g, Kaushik et al, 2015) relative body weight; n, specimen size; ns, not significant at any level; **, highly significant at 1% level (p < 0.01); *, significant at 5% level ( p <0.05) Table II. Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) for condition factors (Fulton's condition factor and relative body weight) with lengths (cm) and body weights (g) of five fishes in the Atrai River, Dinajpur, Bangladesh due to geographical variation but are within the limits for G. cenia (5.50-6.65 cm, Chaki et al, 2013), S. bacaila (3.40-15.20 cm, Masud andSingh, 2015) and S. phulo (6.00-10.70 cm and 1.36-7.21 g, Siddik et al, 2016), respectively. As there is a first record on length and body weight of G. youssoufi in the Atrai River (Islam and Mia, 2016), so no comparison was possible against this value with the previous one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The growth coefficient value b normally lies between 2.5 and 3.5 (Carlander, ; Froese, ) and this value of all three species in the present study was within the expected range as well as within the 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian LWR predictions value in Fishbase (Froese & Pauly, ). Thus, the b value of the same fish species differed with the length range used, sampling sites and season, stomach fullness, gonadal maturity, sex, diet and environmental (Islam et al., ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Fotedar, ; Siddik, Chaklader, Hanif, Islam, & Fotedar, ; Chaklader et al., ). The co‐efficient of determination ( r 2 ) values narrated the proper fitness of the model for growth (Datta, Kaur, Dhawan, & Jassal, ) and fish with ideal growth always shows co‐efficient of determination between 0.9 and <1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For laboratory study, 10% of the total catch was taken from each sampling station covering the representative group of fish. In the laboratory, the collected specimens were identified to species level with the help of standard taxonomic keys of [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Fish Specimen Collection and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%