2020
DOI: 10.1111/jai.14049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length‐weight relationships of eleven fish species captured in 18 streams of the Capim River basin, Brazil

Abstract: The length‐weight relationship is important for the study of populational dynamics. This study aimed to describe the length‐weight relationships (LWR) of 11 fish species sampled on 18 streams of the Capim river basin on eastern Amazon. Specimens were captured in 2014, 2015 and 2017, using sieve nets with 2 mm of mesh size. Fixed specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and conserved in alcohol 70%, measured for standard length (SL, 0.1 cm) and total weight (W, 0.01 g). The 11 species analysed were: Hemigrammus bel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Campos et al, 2020). This effect can be directly associated with the abnormal values of the LWR parameters (Anzueto-Calvo et al, 2017). Although all coefficient of allometry of the species analyzed in this study is within the general range for fishes (2.5 ≥ b ≤ 3.5; Froese, 2006), our LWR estimates were calculated with specimens preserved for more than a year, the older ones collected in the decade of 1990.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Campos et al, 2020). This effect can be directly associated with the abnormal values of the LWR parameters (Anzueto-Calvo et al, 2017). Although all coefficient of allometry of the species analyzed in this study is within the general range for fishes (2.5 ≥ b ≤ 3.5; Froese, 2006), our LWR estimates were calculated with specimens preserved for more than a year, the older ones collected in the decade of 1990.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In a previous study with the same species, Machado et al (2020) got a different result and stated its allometric coefficient was within the general range for any fish species. This difference can resulted from the different methodologies applied in the studies, since Machado et al (2020) only weighted and measured the C. arnoldi exemplars 1 year after their preservation in alcohol, which may cause their retraction by dehydration, once none of the individuals from that study achieved 4 cm length, and in our collection fish ranged from 2 to 5.6 cm. Indeed, in that study the authors suggest future studies to estimate this parameter using fresh and preserved specimens to determine the effects of preservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is important to highlight that our results have a bias because the LWR parameters may have been altered by shrinking and dehydration, promoted by the preservation of the specimens in 4% formalin (Buchheister & Wilson, 2005; Nordeide, 2020). But due to the distance from the sampling sites to the laboratory and the difficulty of measuring in the field, this bias has been unavoidable in the study of stream fish (Campos et al, 2020; Machado et al, 2020; Teixeira da Silva et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%