2011
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.631681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length of stay benchmarks for inpatient rehabilitation after stroke

Abstract: After a single year of implementation, severity specific benchmarks helped the rehabilitation team reduce LOS while maintaining the same levels of functional gain and achieving the same rate of discharge to the community.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ALOS and RLOS for stroke in our study are similar to those in North America, but shorter than in Japan 13,20,21 . Specifically, the RLOS is relatively short compared to another local stroke rehabilitation cohort and this may represent less complex stroke patients, better initial AFIM scores hence requiring less rehabilitation or it may simply reflect better rehabilitation efficiency 7 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The ALOS and RLOS for stroke in our study are similar to those in North America, but shorter than in Japan 13,20,21 . Specifically, the RLOS is relatively short compared to another local stroke rehabilitation cohort and this may represent less complex stroke patients, better initial AFIM scores hence requiring less rehabilitation or it may simply reflect better rehabilitation efficiency 7 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, thanks to the improved clinical outcomes they could face easier rehabilitations, reducing the length of stay of the inpatient rehabilitation that imply huge costs, as underlined by [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Length of stay benchmarks for inpatient rehabilitation after stroke were individualized using the functional status of motor and cognition of patient was studied in Canada (10). Length of study benchmarks were established using 0.75 FIM efficiency, FIM gain divided by length of stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%