2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1413-8670(11)70223-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length of exposure to the hospital environment is more important than antibiotic exposure in healthcare associated infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a comparative study

Abstract: The length of exposure to the hospital environment may be the best predictor of a new HCA-MRSA infection. Use of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones may also stand independently along with presence of chronic ulcers and surgical procedures. No independent association between quantitative antibiotic use and subsequent HCA-MRSA infection was documented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, there is a possibility that some of the patients may have not recalled properly the information on antibiotic use for the past 3 months and even for those who reported some could not mention the name of antibiotic or type of drug used thus underestimating the role of this factor as risk for MRSA acquisition. Furthermore, our findings differ from the findings of other studies, which have reported history of previous hospitalization to be associated with increased risk of MRSA carriage [ 18 , 38 ]. The lack of association may be due to the small number of patients with such risk in the population investigated resulting into lack of power to identify such associations, and this is another limitation of our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, there is a possibility that some of the patients may have not recalled properly the information on antibiotic use for the past 3 months and even for those who reported some could not mention the name of antibiotic or type of drug used thus underestimating the role of this factor as risk for MRSA acquisition. Furthermore, our findings differ from the findings of other studies, which have reported history of previous hospitalization to be associated with increased risk of MRSA carriage [ 18 , 38 ]. The lack of association may be due to the small number of patients with such risk in the population investigated resulting into lack of power to identify such associations, and this is another limitation of our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This can be due to the fact that most of the patients with chronic disease visit hospital often and thus increasing the chance of acquiring the pathogen. Previous studies have reported exposure to antibiotic is associated with risk of MRSA colonization [ 18 , 38 ]. Our findings showed a trend of but non-significantly higher MRSA among patients with previous exposure to antibiotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms are highly tolerant to high amounts of antibiotics and antimicrobial drugs, therefore many biofilm associated infections are considered unhealable [28]. Along with the intrinsic tolerance of biofilms to antibiotic therapy, resistant pathogenic bacteria represent an additional inquiry in antimicrobial therapy [29,30,31,32,33]. The alarming increase of multi-drug resistant bacterial strains and difficult to treat biofilm related infections in wounds require the development of new wound care approaches and therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies concerned open fractures, with time delays ranging from 0 to 24 h [ 18 ]. We found only one study specifically linking longer hospitalization delays with healthcare-associated infections [ 30 ]. In this study from Brazil, patients with nosocomial infections due to MSSA (not only orthopedic implants) revealed a median delay of prior hospital stay of 9 days, compared to MRSA infections with a past median delay of 18 days [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%