2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length distributions of nanowires: Effects of surface diffusion versus nucleation delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the diameter distributions of self-catalyzed III–V can be made remarkably narrow under the appropriate growth conditions (as shown theoretically in refs and and confirmed experimentally for Ga-catalyzed GaAs NWs in ref ), the measured LDs of Au-catalyzed , and In-catalyzed InAs NWs and Ga-catalyzed GaAs NWs appear disappointingly broad, in fact, much broader than Poissonian in most cases. There are five main reasons for that: (i) nucleation randomness of NWs emerging from the substrate (meaning that different NWs start at different times and the initial length dispersion becomes larger for longer nucleation step ), (ii) fluctuation-induced broadening due to random character of growth, (iii) diffusion-induced contributions into the NW elongation rate in the case of Au-catalyzed growth, , (iv) nucleation of secondary group III droplets in the self-catalyzed approach, , and (v) possible collective effects in the NW ensemble such as shadowing in directional molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the diameter distributions of self-catalyzed III–V can be made remarkably narrow under the appropriate growth conditions (as shown theoretically in refs and and confirmed experimentally for Ga-catalyzed GaAs NWs in ref ), the measured LDs of Au-catalyzed , and In-catalyzed InAs NWs and Ga-catalyzed GaAs NWs appear disappointingly broad, in fact, much broader than Poissonian in most cases. There are five main reasons for that: (i) nucleation randomness of NWs emerging from the substrate (meaning that different NWs start at different times and the initial length dispersion becomes larger for longer nucleation step ), (ii) fluctuation-induced broadening due to random character of growth, (iii) diffusion-induced contributions into the NW elongation rate in the case of Au-catalyzed growth, , (iv) nucleation of secondary group III droplets in the self-catalyzed approach, , and (v) possible collective effects in the NW ensemble such as shadowing in directional molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to quantify the statistical properties of the LDs shown in Figure , we use the rate equations for the normalized (∑ s ≥0 f s = 1) probabilities f s ( t ) to observe a NW with the length of s = L / h monolayers at time t , given by ,,,, For the growth rates p s , we use the model of the form Here, v = V / h gives the length-independent average axial growth rate in MLs per min. The second term stands for the shadow effect in the linear approximation, with shorter NWs (with s < ⟨ s ⟩) growing slower and longer NWs (with s < ⟨ s ⟩) growing faster than the NWs having the mean length ⟨ s ⟩ = ⟨ L ⟩/ h .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variation of the NW diameter implies that the diameters of the original Ga droplets exhibit a broad distribution. Also, the simplest explanation for a pronounced inhomogeneity of the NW length is that NWs nucleate at different times [35,36], leading to broader length distributions for longer incubation times. Conversely, NWs that are very homogeneous in length and diameter, as found below 620 °C, must have nucleated from similar droplets and almost simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theoretical analysis of the initial Ga droplet size was based on the assumption that an incubation time is needed to reach a critical As concentration in the droplets [34]. Further studies showed how the incubation time affects the length distribution of the final NW ensembles [35,36]. Faster nucleation always yields more uniform length over the ensemble, while longer nucleation delay results in broader length distributions with a pronounced asymmetry toward smaller lengths (corresponding to nanowires that have emerged later).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake of substrate atoms by nanoparticles deposited on the substrate at elevated temperatures has been observed for A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t different nanoparticle/substrate systems [12][13][14][15][16][17] and, in nanowire growth experiments, claimed responsible for changing growth directions [18] or optical properties of nanowires [19][20] (due to incorporation of substrate atoms into the nanowire). Another important consequence of the substrate dissolution into the catalyst is a delayed nanowire growth, which is suspected to cause broad nanowire length distributions [21], thus making such nanowire arrays unsuitable for device fabrication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%