1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf03322191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lelong numbers of positive plurisubharmonic currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
49
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This theorem generalizes a result proved by [1] with ϕ(z) = |z| 2 , v(t) = |t| 2 and B an open ball in L.…”
Section: Our Main Results Issupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This theorem generalizes a result proved by [1] with ϕ(z) = |z| 2 , v(t) = |t| 2 and B an open ball in L.…”
Section: Our Main Results Issupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Then by [3] we have j * s (α z ) = j * s (β z )/s. We first prove the following proposition which is a Lelong-Jensen type formula, see [4] and [1].…”
Section: Abridged English Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is: if ı : X → X is the blow-up of X at x and T is a cluster value of the sequence ı * (T n ), then the mass of T on the exceptional divisor is equal to the Lelong number ν(T , x) (the proof is exactly the same using formula (6)). Now we define in the same way L p (T ) which is a well defined positive pluriharmonic current of bidegree (1,1). Observe that the arguments of Sect.…”
Section: Lemma 52 Let T Be a Pluriharmonic Current Of Bidimension (Pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Once again, the Lelong number at a point does not depend on the choice of coordinates (see [1] for the proof in a more general setting of pluriharmonic currents), so we can speak of Lelong numbers on a manifold. Lemma 2.1 still applies for positive pluriharmonic currents.…”
Section: Lemma 52 Let T Be a Pluriharmonic Current Of Bidimension (Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, z n ) a coordinate system at a such that∂z j = O(|z|) and ∂z j = O(|z|). We use the notation Following calculations made in [3], we have (1,1) .…”
Section: Abridged English Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%