The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.5.613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leisure Time Physical Activity of People with Spinal Cord Injury: Mainly with Clubs of Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Busan-Kyeongnam, Korea

Abstract: ObjectiveTo estimate hours of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) performed by people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and to identify the demographic and injury-related characteristics associated with LTPA of people with chronic SCI.MethodSeventy nine persons with SCI living in Busan and Gyongsangnam-do were recruited. They completed a self-administered questionnaire, which consisted of items about personal characteristics, type of LTPA, hours of LTPA, LTPA intensity, and LTPA satisfaction.ResultsMost … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the PA levels in the different countries may relate to different amount of services and support for PAs, however, the use of the different instruments may as well contribute to the different findings. The fact that this study population spent the most time on light and the least time on strenuous PAs differs from findings from the Canadian and Korean SCI populations, where people spent the most time on moderate-intensity PAs (Kim et al 2011;Martin Ginis et al 2010a). In our study, especially women, pedestrians using devices and people using an electric wheelchair carried out significantly fewer moderate-intensity PAs than men and people using a manual wheelchair.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The differences in the PA levels in the different countries may relate to different amount of services and support for PAs, however, the use of the different instruments may as well contribute to the different findings. The fact that this study population spent the most time on light and the least time on strenuous PAs differs from findings from the Canadian and Korean SCI populations, where people spent the most time on moderate-intensity PAs (Kim et al 2011;Martin Ginis et al 2010a). In our study, especially women, pedestrians using devices and people using an electric wheelchair carried out significantly fewer moderate-intensity PAs than men and people using a manual wheelchair.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Several studies investigated PA levels in people with SCI (Anneken et al 2010;Buchholz et al 2003;de Groot et al 2011;Martin Ginis et al 2010a;Rauch et al 2014;Tasiemski et al 2000 (Martin Ginis et al 2005) to 3.1 h/day on all types of leisure-time PAs in a Korean sample (using a self-developed questionnaire) (Kim et al 2011). The differences in the PA levels in the different countries may relate to different amount of services and support for PAs, however, the use of the different instruments may as well contribute to the different findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 Results are inconsistent for the impact of the severity of the lesion and the time since the onset of SCI. 7,15 In this study population, these two characteristics made no difference in PiS. The inconsistent findings suggest that these characteristics cannot be applied to explain PiS universally and that more insight is required to understand when they influence PiS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Other studies with smaller sample sizes did not report on gender differences. [15][16][17][18][19] In the general Swiss population, gender differences in PiS disappeared almost completely in the able-bodied population. 13 Accordingly, no gender differences in PiS were observed in the study population at the time before the onset of SCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%