2005
DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axi126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leibnizian Causation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Leibniz's more typical response does not appeal to nonnecessitating grounds. This response instead purports to reconcile necessitating grounds with the contingency of their consequences by 12 For more on the connection between ontological priority ("priority in nature") and conceptual priority, see Rauzy (1995), Rutherford (1998), Di Bella (2005), and Futch (2005. 13 Cf.…”
Section: Leibniz and The Dilemma Of Rational Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Leibniz's more typical response does not appeal to nonnecessitating grounds. This response instead purports to reconcile necessitating grounds with the contingency of their consequences by 12 For more on the connection between ontological priority ("priority in nature") and conceptual priority, see Rauzy (1995), Rutherford (1998), Di Bella (2005), and Futch (2005. 13 Cf.…”
Section: Leibniz and The Dilemma Of Rational Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 For more on the connection between ontological priority (“priority in nature”) and conceptual priority, see Rauzy (1995), Rutherford (1998), Di Bella (2005), and Futch (2005). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"7 The similarity of causes so conceived to J. L. Mackie's INUS conditions is striking. For an elaboration of these points of convergence, seeFutch (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%