1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0034412500024057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence

Abstract: Toward the end of 1676 Leibniz met Spinoza a number of times. In one of those meetings Leibniz presented a proof of the possibility of God's existence. In his proof Leibniz presupposed that a proposition is necessarily true only if its truth is either demonstrable or self-evident and that the divine perfections are simple and affirmative qualities. I contend that Leibniz's presuppositions undermine, rather than establish, the necessary existence of ‘a God of the kind in whom the pious believe’. My assessment i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a starting point I will take the last manuscript (A81)the text which was presented to Spinoza. 15 I will not comment on the validity of the argumentation, the assuming of the opposite as a method or the procedure through definitions (more about the argumentation in Lomasky 1970;Blumenfeld 1972;Werther 1996;Nachtomy 2011, as well as in Blumenfeld 1995, 357-364); in this case, only the individual claims are important. To this end I provide a structured analysis, which follows the chronology of the exposition and distinguishes the individual steps.…”
Section: A81: That a Most Perfect Being Existsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a starting point I will take the last manuscript (A81)the text which was presented to Spinoza. 15 I will not comment on the validity of the argumentation, the assuming of the opposite as a method or the procedure through definitions (more about the argumentation in Lomasky 1970;Blumenfeld 1972;Werther 1996;Nachtomy 2011, as well as in Blumenfeld 1995, 357-364); in this case, only the individual claims are important. To this end I provide a structured analysis, which follows the chronology of the exposition and distinguishes the individual steps.…”
Section: A81: That a Most Perfect Being Existsmentioning
confidence: 99%