Leibniz

McRae, Robert

doi:10.3138/9781487579777

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Remaining Questions1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2010

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Book4

Article1

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 150 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…54 How exactly to understand Leibnizian apperception, and its relation to consciousness, is a matter of interpretive dispute, into which there is not space to enter here. For different accounts, see McRae (1976), Kulstad (1991), Simmons (2001), and Jorgensen (2019).…”

Section: Remaining Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Leibniz and the Molyneux Problem

Ehli

2020

Journal of Modern Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Molyneux problem is one of the major questions addressed by early modern authors. Whereas Locke's response to Molyneux's question has been the subject of extensive scholarly discussion, Leibniz's response has received comparatively little attention. This paper defends an interpretation of Leibniz's nuanced response to the problem and criticizes a competing interpretation that has recently been proposed.

show abstract

Section: Remaining Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…argues that Leibniz offers two accounts of innateness in the New Essays: a dispositional account and a reflection-based account. See alsoJolley (1988) McRae (1976). attributes to Leibniz a logical account of innateness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%