2016
DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2016-1-62-82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legitimation of Commercial Surrogacy in Russia

Abstract: лектронный журнал «Экономическая социология» издаётся с 2000 г. Учредителями являются Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (с 2007 г.) и Вадим Валерьевич Радаев (главный редактор). Цель журнала-утверждать международные стандарты экономико-социологических исследований в России, представлять современные работы российских и зарубежных авторов в области экономической социологии, информировать профессиональное сообщество о новых актуальных публикациях и исследовательских проектах, а т… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weis’s (2017) ethnographic study on the cultural framing and social organisation of surrogacy in Russia and Siegl’s (2018) study of the emotional labour of surrogates in Russia and their affective aligning with dominant narratives are the most recent qualitative academic contributions. Apart from these studies, Dushina and colleagues (2016) have critically analysed the rhetorical manoeuvres that surrogacy managers use to legitimise their practices; Isupova (2014) has parsed the discursive strategies of infertile women negotiating kinship on Russian web forums relating to ARTs; Nartova (2009) has performed a discursive analysis of surrogacy and sperm donorship in the Russian print media; and a number of studies have examined the legal specificities of practising surrogacy in Russia (Arslanov and Nizamieva, 2015; Borisova, 2014; Khazova, 2013; Svitnev, 2010, 2016).…”
Section: Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weis’s (2017) ethnographic study on the cultural framing and social organisation of surrogacy in Russia and Siegl’s (2018) study of the emotional labour of surrogates in Russia and their affective aligning with dominant narratives are the most recent qualitative academic contributions. Apart from these studies, Dushina and colleagues (2016) have critically analysed the rhetorical manoeuvres that surrogacy managers use to legitimise their practices; Isupova (2014) has parsed the discursive strategies of infertile women negotiating kinship on Russian web forums relating to ARTs; Nartova (2009) has performed a discursive analysis of surrogacy and sperm donorship in the Russian print media; and a number of studies have examined the legal specificities of practising surrogacy in Russia (Arslanov and Nizamieva, 2015; Borisova, 2014; Khazova, 2013; Svitnev, 2010, 2016).…”
Section: Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%