Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands

Abstract

The current paper examines the legitimacy dilemmas that rise from local governments’ direct policy instruments and market interventions. It takes the case of public land management strategies. The paper argues that current societal challenges—such as energy transition, climate change and inclusive urban innovation—require planning practices to be more effective. Direct government instruments such as direct market interventions have proven to significantly reduce the implementation gap of planning practice. Looking at significant urban challenges, municipalities worldwide could be urged to apply such direct government instruments on a larger scale in the future. However, although direct government intervention in markets can be very effective, it is also controversial in terms of legitimacy. It explicitly and inevitably introduces financial incentives to the organization of government. Balancing these incentives against spatial planning interests unavoidably causes dilemmas. Based on eight Dutch case studies, this paper develops a framework to systematically spell out the legitimacy dilemmas that stem from public market intervention. It facilitates an explicit discussion on varying instrumental rationalities and improving the legitimacy of public action.

Do Public-Led Housing Site Development Projects Affect Local Housing Prices: A Proposal for a Comprehensive Policy Evaluation Methodology

“…In particular, the Housing Site Development Project, which is the subject of this study, has been promoted in a short period of time as a government-led housing site supply policy. There are several countries and cities that have also considered the use of public land development strategies [6,7]. The results of this study will have implications globally.…”

Evaluation of the operation status of the residential land market in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China and its spatiotemporal pattern characteristics

“…One is the review of land market operation mechanism and related policies. The studies are mostly based on the concept and attributes of land in economics, and review the connotation [10][11][12] and operation mechanism [13][14][15] of land market. Second, the evaluation of land market operation efficiency, most scholars consider the degree of land marketization [16], the effectiveness of macro-control policies [17], and the size of its effect on socio-economic development [18][19][20] as important factors in evaluating land market operation efficiency.…”

Using Sustainability-Oriented Developer Obligations and Public Land Development to Create Public Value

“…Contributions are also made to the literature on public land development. The majority of this previous literature comes from the Netherlands and is focused on their institutional framework (e.g., [4,19,20]). However, public land development is also used in varying degrees in the Nordic countries including Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway, (see, e.g., [2,5,[21][22][23]), as well as in Switzerland [24], Austria [25] and the United States [26,27].…”