2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legislation restricting gender-affirming care for transgender youth: Politics eclipse healthcare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, fewer than 1200 patients in this age group underwent GAS, even in the highest volume years. GAS in adolescents has been the focus of intense debate and led to legislative initiatives to limit access to these procedures in adolescents in several states …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our cohort, fewer than 1200 patients in this age group underwent GAS, even in the highest volume years. GAS in adolescents has been the focus of intense debate and led to legislative initiatives to limit access to these procedures in adolescents in several states …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous reports have described the political considerations and challenges in the delivery of transgender care . Despite many medical societies recognizing the necessity of gender-affirming care, several states have enacted legislation or policies that restrict gender-affirming care and services, particularly in adolescence . These regulations are barriers for patients who seek gender-affirming care and provide legal and ethical challenges for clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of the bills suggest that gender identity may not be fully formed at that age and that undergoing treatment to affirm one’s gender identity may result in harm, particularly for treatments that have long-lasting effects (See Alabama Senate Bill 184 ( 2022 ); Arizona Senate Bill, 1138 ( 2022 ); Ohio House Bill 454 ( 2022 ), for examples). However, opponents have been quick to mobilize in response to the bills, arguing that transgender youth are being targeted because of discriminatory views of transgender people (e.g., Kraschel et al, 2022 ; Wyckoff, 2022 ). They further note that the bills do not comport with the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s ( 2012 ) standards of care guidance, which states that adolescents should be provided with gender-affirming care to minimize their experience of gender dysphoria.…”
Section: Legislation On Gender-affirming Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worryingly, public policy recently debated and enacted in places such as the United States (e.g., in Texas) threatens to investigate families of transgender children for “abuse” when they seek gender-affirming care. 8 Such discriminatory policy not only adds to courtesy stigma faced by well-intentioned members of transgender people's social networks, it also risks enforced social disruption by dividing families and communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%