2002
DOI: 10.1086/341771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legionnaires Disease with Bacteremic Coinfection

Abstract: We describe 6 patients who had bacteremic community-acquired pneumonia and unsuspected Legionella pneumophila coinfection. We reviewed case records of patients who were diagnosed as having a recent Legionella infection on the basis of either the presence of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine or a 4-fold increase in L. pneumophila antibody level and with a blood culture that yielded a bacterium other than L. pneumophila. Three patients were diagnosed with legionellosis on the basis of the presence of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 10 patients with potentially false-positive results using PLY-ELISA. The observed positive result was probably associated with mixed infections (24,29,30). Two findings that strongly support this hypothesis are that M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, and L. pneumophila lysates produced negative results in PLY-ELISA, whereas the Binax Now S. pneumoniae test was positive in three out of seven of the pneumonia cases diagnosed as nonpneumococcal pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We identified 10 patients with potentially false-positive results using PLY-ELISA. The observed positive result was probably associated with mixed infections (24,29,30). Two findings that strongly support this hypothesis are that M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, and L. pneumophila lysates produced negative results in PLY-ELISA, whereas the Binax Now S. pneumoniae test was positive in three out of seven of the pneumonia cases diagnosed as nonpneumococcal pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Unfortunately, no more sample material was left, so further analysis was not possible. We cannot exclude a possible double infection with both bacteria, which has been observed earlier (Dickgieβer et al, 1985;Tan et al, 2002). However, it might also be a false positive reaction in the ImmuView® test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The retrospective analysis of these 54 case patients found an in-hospital mortality rate of 25.9%. There had some reports describing such a high mortality rate among HIV patients with active TB and specific bacteria like L. pneumophila and S. pneumoniae infections [30,31]. In addition, hospital-acquired gram-negative bacterial pneumonia has also been regarded as a poor prognostic factor for patients with TB [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%