Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2971485.2996745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legibility of Light and Ultra-Light Fonts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Question 1 of the experiment, we asked how quickly the participants could spot the car plate in video 1. In video 2, we asked for the airport sign, which was obfuscated as a silhouette as the sun was setting at 40°; none of the participants were able to identify it, which is in line with the findings of similar work [54,[75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In Question 1 of the experiment, we asked how quickly the participants could spot the car plate in video 1. In video 2, we asked for the airport sign, which was obfuscated as a silhouette as the sun was setting at 40°; none of the participants were able to identify it, which is in line with the findings of similar work [54,[75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For participants with normal vision, multiple experiments have shown positive effects of letter boldness for text emphasis (Bateman et al, 2008;Dyson & Beier, 2016), small font sizes (Beier & Oderkerk, 2019b;Sheedy et al, 2005), and low luminance conditions (Burmistrov et al, 2016). However, our findings failed to show that letter boldness improves low vision reading.…”
Section: Letter Boldnesscontrasting
confidence: 85%