2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.100.042117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leggett-Garg macrorealism and the quantum nondisturbance conditions

Abstract: We investigate the relation between a refined version of Leggett and Garg conditions for macrorealism, namely the no-signaling-in-time (NSIT) conditions, and the quantum mechanical notion of nondisturbance between measurements. We show that all NSIT conditions are satisfied for any state preparation if and only if certain compatibility criteria on the state-update rules relative to the measurements, i.e. quantum instruments, are met. The systematic treatment of NSIT conditions supported by structural results o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the standard assumption of realism, i.e., that physical variables have a definite value at any instant of time, macrorealist theories assume that such values can be measured in a noninvasive way. The latter is a strong condition that makes LG experiments challenging due to the clumsiness loophole [23]: A clumsy measurement alone may be responsible for the violation of the LG inequality, and considerable effort is needed to close it [24][25][26][27][28]. It is clear, then, that any information processing task where the information carrier is modified by sequential operations cannot be discussed in terms of LG inequalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the standard assumption of realism, i.e., that physical variables have a definite value at any instant of time, macrorealist theories assume that such values can be measured in a noninvasive way. The latter is a strong condition that makes LG experiments challenging due to the clumsiness loophole [23]: A clumsy measurement alone may be responsible for the violation of the LG inequality, and considerable effort is needed to close it [24][25][26][27][28]. It is clear, then, that any information processing task where the information carrier is modified by sequential operations cannot be discussed in terms of LG inequalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We comment that violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities have been predicted and tested for a range of superposition states (e.g. [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]) and alternative procedures exist to justify NIM.…”
Section: B Leggett-garg Inequality and Violationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this concept the violation of KC or its corresponding LG-type inequality will simply imply a violation of macro-realism. In addition, it has been proven recently that KC or nosignaling-in-time is equivalent to non-disturbance property of the intermediate measurement, defined when the observable associated with the latter measurement observable is invariant under non-selective measurements at all possible intermediate time steps [61].…”
Section: Leggett-garg Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%