The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2005.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal traditions and competition policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is far less empirical literature on the effects of legal origins on economic freedom than one may think, with direct tests including Nattinger and Hall (2012), March et al (2017) and Murphy (2021). Tests on only some aspects of economic freedom include La Porta et al (1998), Mahoney (2001), Djankov et al (2002), Botero et al (2004), Lee (2005), Berkowitz and Clay (2005;2006), Besley and Ghatak (2010), and Davis and Williamson (2016). Results tend to support the conclusion that British legal origins are beneficial for economic freedom and French legal origins are harmful, although this finding is hardly universal.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is far less empirical literature on the effects of legal origins on economic freedom than one may think, with direct tests including Nattinger and Hall (2012), March et al (2017) and Murphy (2021). Tests on only some aspects of economic freedom include La Porta et al (1998), Mahoney (2001), Djankov et al (2002), Botero et al (2004), Lee (2005), Berkowitz and Clay (2005;2006), Besley and Ghatak (2010), and Davis and Williamson (2016). Results tend to support the conclusion that British legal origins are beneficial for economic freedom and French legal origins are harmful, although this finding is hardly universal.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%